Derek Chauvin: Former police officer found guilty of killing George Floyd requests new trial

The defence attorney for the former Minneapolis police officer convicted of killing George Floyd has requested a new trial, according to a court document filed on Tuesday.

Derek Chauvin was convicted last month of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in the May 25, 2020 death of Floyd.

Evidence at trial showed Chauvin pressed his knee against Floyd's neck for 9 1/2 minutes as the black man said he could not breathe and went motionless.

Read More
Demand for review into sexual harassment in Scottish schools
Former police officer found guilty of killing George Floyd requests new trialFormer police officer found guilty of killing George Floyd requests new trial
Former police officer found guilty of killing George Floyd requests new trial
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Defence attorney Eric Nelson cited many reasons in his request for a new trial.

He said Judge Peter Cahill abused the discretion of the court and violated Chauvin's right to due process and a fair trial when he denied Mr Nelson's request to move the trial to another county due to pretrial publicity.

He also said Mr Cahill abused his discretion when he denied an earlier request for a new trial based on publicity during the proceedings, which Mr Nelson said threatened the fairness of the trial.

Mr Nelson also took issue with Mr Cahill's refusal to sequester the jury for the trial or admonish them to avoid all media, and with his refusal to allow a man who was with Floyd at the time of his arrest to testify.

A memorial of George Floyd was created near the court which heard the three-week trial. (Chandan Khanna/AFP/Getty)A memorial of George Floyd was created near the court which heard the three-week trial. (Chandan Khanna/AFP/Getty)
A memorial of George Floyd was created near the court which heard the three-week trial. (Chandan Khanna/AFP/Getty)

Mr Nelson asked the judge to impeach the verdict on the grounds that the jury committed misconduct, felt pressured, and/or failed to adhere to jury instructions, though the filing did not include details about that assertion. To impeach a verdict is to question its validity.

The brief did not mention recent reports that one of the jurors participated in an August 28 march in Washington, DC, to honour Martin Luther King Jr.

That juror, Brandon Mitchell, has defended his actions, saying the event was to commemorate the 1963 March on Washington and was not a protest over Floyd's death.

Floyd's brother and sister, Philonise and Bridgett Floyd, and relatives of others who had been shot by police addressed the crowd at the march last summer.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Mr Nelson did not immediately return a message seeking details on his allegation of juror misconduct.

A message from the Editor:Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by Coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.