Hogwart's Express: Operator of Jacobite stream train made famous by Harry Potter films loses High Court challenge over doors, placing tours at risk
Heritage tours involving the world-renowned ‘Hogwart’s Express’ could be now at risk, after the operator of the train service featuring in the Harry Potter films lost a High Court challenge against a rail regulator over the safety of doors on its carriages.
West Coast Railway Company Ltd (WCRCL) took legal action against the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) after it refused to exempt the company from rules banning the use of hinged doors without central locking earlier this year.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe company, which runs the Jacobite service – known popularly as the Hogwarts Express – complained the multimillion-pound cost of having to retrofit central locking could “destroy” its business and argued its door systems were just as safe. But in a ruling on Friday, a judge dismissed the operator’s case and concluded the ORR had taken a “justifiable” approach.
Mrs Justice Thornton said in her written judgment that WCRCL was the largest operator of “heritage train tours” in the UK. The company also operates the Flying Scotsman, “which is considered to be one of the best-known locomotives in the world”.
The Jacobite, a popular tourist attraction, runs between Mallaig and Fort William across the Glenfinnan Viaduct in the Scottish Highlands.
The judge said a feature of WCRCL’s Mark I trains is their hinged doors, which “can be opened by anyone inside the train even when the train is moving”.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdInstead of a central locking system, WCRCL’s vehicles have a “secondary” mechanism where doors are pulled shut into a locked position and a bolt is used on the inside of a coach.
The ORR, the safety regulator on Britain’s railways, told the judge “it does not wish to see heritage train operators go out of business”, but from March wanted to ensure heritage trains “meet minimum safety standards” by introducing central locking.
Safety regulations were made in 1999 after passengers were killed or injured by falling from the doors of Mark I trains or being hit by doors opened at platforms, the court was told. In January 2005, a rule came into force banning rolling stock with hinged doors without central locking, but the regulator can issue exemptions.
WCRCL’s legal challenge centred on an ORR exemption refusal in January and March.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe operator has an exemption in place until February 29, 2024, after a whistleblower report triggered an ORR inspection that led to safety changes by WCRCL earlier this year.
The company, whose trains run at speeds of up to 100 miles per hour, argued in court that its door procedures were as safe as a central locking mechanism, with train stewards operating them and warning signs for passengers.
The ORR disagreed and took the view that WCRCL was “unable to demonstrate that its controls of the risks from secondary door locking make it as safe as central door locking”. The operator claimed the ORR’s earlier decision was a “serious interference” the regulator had “wholly failed” to justify.
At a hearing last month, WCRCL’s lawyers said it would “destroy” the business if it had to spend around £7 million to fit central locking, “which is approximately seven times the company’s average annual net profit, thereby wiping out the company’s profits for the best part of a decade”.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThey said £50m in economic value to the wider community would be lost “if the business does not survive”, claiming this had been “disregarded” by the ORR alongside other considerations.
The Jacobite contributes £19.3m a year to the Scottish economy on top of £4.72m in ticket revenue from 101,429 passenger journeys, the court was told.
ORR was accused of acting disproportionately and unlawfully, while it was also alleged it had “misinterpreted” safety regulations. But Mrs Justice Thornton concluded “the general interest lay firmly in favour of refusing [WCRCL]’s application for an exemption”.
She said it was “common sense” that a central locking system was safer than one “dependent on no more than an assumption by the guard that the stewards have locked the doors”.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe judge said the ORR had previously noted there was no evidence of a WCRCL investigation or “lessons learnt” after a train left York station with a door open in October 2020 and when a passenger overpowered a steward to open the door of a moving train in June 2022.
The ORR’s upper estimate to fit out four trains for daily use with central locking was just under £1.4m, the judge said, adding that a “modest” rise in fares – amid WCRCL having a “monopoly” – should allow it to pay for fitting the system “in a phased manner”.
A £10 increase in the Jacobite service fare, where an average return ticket is £46.58, would generate about an extra £1m a year in revenue with no additional overheads, Mrs Justice Thornton said.
WCRCL said in a statement it would now consider ways to safeguard services, including evaluating the grounds for an appeal, and the potential to work with the ORR on a new exemption application.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdCommercial manager James Shuttleworth said: “We are disappointed by the High Court’s judgment. We have decades of experience of operating on the main line and safety has always been, and remains, our top priority.
“We will now reflect and consider options to enable us to continue running safe services enjoyed by so many visitors from the UK and around the world, upon which local businesses along our routes rely.
“We are committed to working with the ORR to find a long-term solution which safeguards the future of heritage services on the main line."
Welcoming the ruling, an ORR spokesperson said: “As the rail regulator, we are committed to ensuring the safety of all passengers. Other charter heritage operators which use the mainline railway have made the necessary investment to install central door locking on ‘hinged door’ carriages and it remains open to the West Coast Railway Company Limited to do the same.
“Such converted carriages can both retain their heritage appeal yet also reflect minimum modern safety standards.”
Comments
Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.