Rangers Big Tax Case verdict: Supreme Court rules in favour of HMRC

The Supreme Court have dismissed a final appeal by liquidators BDO over Rangers' use of Employee Benefit Trusts, finally bringing an end to legal proceedings in what became known as the '˜big tax case'.

This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a small commission on items purchased through this article, but that does not affect our editorial judgement.

Liquidators of oldco Rangers appealed the previous verdict. Picture: John DevlinLiquidators of oldco Rangers appealed the previous verdict. Picture: John Devlin
Liquidators of oldco Rangers appealed the previous verdict. Picture: John Devlin

The ruling was handed down by the court this morning as judges Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hodge found in favour of HMRC that income tax and national insurance contributions should have been paid on the trusts which Sir David Murray’s group of companies used to pay employees from 2001 to 2009.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

HMRC had previously list its initial appeal at a First Tier Tax Tribunal in October 2012, a judgement which was then upheld by an Upper Tier Tribunal in July 2014. HMRC made a third appeal, the the Court of Session, which ruled in their favour in November 2015.

BDO, acting on behalf of creditors in the liquidation of RFC 2012 (former The Rangers Football Club plc) were given leave to make a further appeal to the Supreme Court which heard the case over two days in March this year. Today’s decision is binding on all parties.

Read More
Scottish football fans react on Twitter to Rangers Europa League exit

The outcome has no material bearing on the current owners of Rangers in the aftermath of the club’s financial collapse in 2012.

The Scottish football authorities are likely to face renewed calls, however, to consider the possibility of stripping honours won by Rangers during the years when EBTs were used.

An independent commission chaired by Lord Nimmo Smith in February 2013 decided the club had gained no competitive advantage when they breached league rules by making undeclared payments to players.

Related topics: