No-limit workplace parking levy ‘frightening life out of businesses’ dismissed as ‘scaremongering’

The Scottish Conservatives have claimed the lack of a limit on workplace parking charges would “frighten the life out of businesses” – but that was rubbished as “scaremongering” by SNP transport minister Jenny Gilruth.

The row came as MSPs considered the scheme that would enable councils to charge employers for office parking spaces, which could be passed onto their staff.

Powers to enable workplace parking levies to go ahead are due to come into effect next month, with Edinburgh and Glasgow city councils among those interested in introducing schemes.

Income would be ring fenced for transport improvements.

Employers would pay an annual levy on every parking space at their premises which they could pass onto staff and visitors. Picture: Jason ChadwickEmployers would pay an annual levy on every parking space at their premises which they could pass onto staff and visitors. Picture: Jason Chadwick
Employers would pay an annual levy on every parking space at their premises which they could pass onto staff and visitors. Picture: Jason Chadwick
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It follows Nottingham becoming the first council in the UK to introduce a scheme in 2012, which Ms Gilruth said had raised £56 million in its first six years.

Scottish Conservatives transport spokesperson Graham Simpson told the Scottish Parliament’s net zero, energy and transport committee he was “astonished” at the lack of any limit to the charge, which is £428-a-year per space in Nottingham.

He said: “That will frighten the life out of businesses across Scotland.

"The Scottish Chambers of Commerce and Glasgow Chamber of Commerce are saying this levy should be scrapped or at least put on hold while we recover from the pandemic.”

However, Ms Gilruth said: “This is a matter for local authorities to decide upon.

"If I was to come and set a top limit for this, I would be accused of interfering with local democratic principles.

"We’ve got to get the balance right here.

"I think it’s really important that local authorities are trusted to look at their local circumstances.

"I would expect them to set an appropriate cost accordingly.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"I would be concerned that Mr Simpson is potentially scaremongering on this issue."

Read More
Labour to oppose workplace parking levy despite its Edinburgh leader’s support

But Mr Simpson said: “I’m not scaremongering.

"I was asking about the charge for the licence and there isn’t, as you’ve confirmed, an upper limit for that.”

Committee convener Dean Lockhart pointed out councils were limited as to how much they could raise council tax levels.

The Scottish Conservative MSP said the lack of a limit could potentially cause “some concern for businesses, large and small throughout the country who might have to pay it”.

Ms Gilruth said she would write to the committee with the rationale for not imposing a limit, as she was not the minister when the legislation was introduced.

However, she said: “We don’t want to make this a prohibitive measure at all.”

The scheme would not cover shopping centres or retail parks, but councils could choose to include schools, colleges and universities.

Other exemptions include healthcare workers at hospitals.

Scottish Liberal Democrat transport spokesperson Jill Reilly described the lack of a limit as “dire news for ordinary Scots already facing a cost-of-living crisis".

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

She said there had been little thought of the impact on those in urban areas “whose streets will be blocked with displaced vehicles, and those who can’t get public transport to their work”.

The Scottish Retail Consortium has called for the plans to be paused or safeguards added such as a cap on the levy “so it is not punitive”.

Director David Lonsdale said: “Such levies remain a recipe for extra cost and complexity, especially as firms already pay business rates on the parking places they provide for staff.”

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.



Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.