Shell: Court case in Netherlands could force fossil fuel companies to get out of oil and gas altogether – Dr Richard Dixon

Shell is in court today in the Netherlands for the first day of a case which could see them have to get out of fossil fuels altogether.

Fossil fuel companies will be nervously watching a court case in the Netherlands which seeks to make oil giant shell change its strategy, says Richard Dixon (Picture: Daniel Azocar/Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Shell is the second-biggest oil company in the world and around the globe it is responsible for twice as much carbon dioxide emissions as the country it is based in, the Netherlands. And, despite knowing about the role of fossil fuels in climate change for decades and despite the targets in the Paris Agreement of 2015, the company is still investing in expanding production and has actively tried to block action on the climate crisis.

In April 2018, our sister Friends of the Earth group in the Netherlands and six other organisations announced they would take Shell to court if it did not change course. In April 2019, the court case began, and it is now backed by over 17,000 ordinary citizens as co-plaintiffs. There are expected to be four days of hearings this month with a judgement from the court expected in January.

One of the reasons this case is raising so much excitement is because, just under a year ago, the Dutch Supreme Court upheld a previous court ruling that the Dutch government must urgently reduce climate emissions in line with its human rights obligations.

The ‘Urgenda Climate Case’ was the first time anywhere in the world that a group of citizens proved that their government has a legal duty to cut emissions and the UN’s Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and the Environment called the ruling “a huge victory for billions of people vulnerable to the devastating impacts of the climate crisis and a timely nail in the coffin of the fossil fuel industry”.

We are several years into the crucial decade to reduce emissions enough to keep the world’s final temperature rise below the critical 1.5C threshold. That would be a big enough challenge without Shell continuing to look for new fossil fuels and planning to open up new sources of oil and gas until at least 2030, with no firm end date in sight.

Shell might tell you it is already diversifying but over 95 per cent of its investments go into oil and gas production. It is also investing in disinformation. In the three years after the Paris Agreement, the five largest publicly traded oil companies spent about $1 billion (£750 million) on “misleading climate-related branding and lobbying” to delay and weaken action on climate change, according to a report by think tank InfluenceMap. Shell was the second biggest spender after BP.

Like the rest of the oil industry, Shell will tell you about its plans to reduce emissions caused by extracting and refining oil into road fuels but it takes no responsibility at all for the 85 per cent of emissions that result from people using its petrol and diesel. We should no longer allow this outrageous abrogation of responsibility by any company or sector, especially those whose business model threatens our very lives.

Every oil company in the world will be nervously watching what happens in the Netherlands today. If the world’s second-largest oil company can be forced into a massive change of strategy, it spells the eventual end for all of them.

Dr Richard Dixon is director of Friends of the Earth Scotland

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.