Alex Salmond inquiry: MSPs must test the truth of his incendiary claims about a 'malicious scheme' against him – Scotsman comment

In his evidence to the MSPs’ committee investigating the Scottish government’s mishandling of complaints made against him, Alex Salmond said he was not alleging there had been a conspiracy against him.

Former first minister Alex Salmond says there is further evidence to support his claims that MSPs are not being allowed to see (Picture: Andy Buchanan/PA Wire)

Instead, he called it a “malicious scheme or plan or campaign over a prolonged period of time”, making a distinction that may be lost on many members of the public.

The former First Minister said he had evidence to support his claims, pointing to text messages sent by SNP figures, including one by Peter Murrell, Nicola Sturgeon’s husband and the party’s chief executive, in which, the day after Salmond was charged, he said it was a “good time to be pressurising” the police.

Sign up to our Opinion newsletter

Sign up to our Opinion newsletter

But he also made clear that he believes there is evidence that the committee has not been allowed to see that would provide further backing for his allegations.

Given what we know about Salmond’s admitted behaviour, his reputation will be forever tarnished and so he should not be regarded the most upstanding of citizens.

However, his evidence will be fuel to the fire of conspiracy theorists who have not been quite so circumspect as him and that poses a danger to the reputation of Scotland’s democratic and legal institutions. It is most unsatisfactory that this shadow of suspicion should be allowed to hang over them in this way.

Read More

Read More
Alex Salmond inquiry: Former First Minister's command of detail puts the pressur...

The committee is examining the Scottish government’s handling of the complaints against Salmond and MSPs have stressed that he is not on trial. However, the conflicting accounts of Salmond and Sturgeon must be properly tested and so both are on trial if only in the court of public opinion.

The credibility and integrity of the current First Minister and other senior figures in the SNP and government have been called into question. The people of Scotland need to know whether or not Salmond’s claims are true or not and have confidence in the process of establishing this.

All pertinent evidence – including the Scottish government’s legal advice about its position in the judicial review of the complaints process brought by Salmond – that can be made public, should be.

The anonymity of the women who complained about Salmond’s actions must be preserved and if the Salmond inquiry committee must sit in private in order for this to be achieved, then so be it, but it does need to get to the bottom of whether there was a “malicious plan” or a conspiracy, call it what you will, or not.

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.


Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.