Audit Scotland's damning report on farm IT chaos

'The system still requires much work and cost,' said NFU Scotland president Andrew McCornick. Picture: Contributed'The system still requires much work and cost,' said NFU Scotland president Andrew McCornick. Picture: Contributed
'The system still requires much work and cost,' said NFU Scotland president Andrew McCornick. Picture: Contributed

This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a small commission on items purchased through this article, but that does not affect our editorial judgement.

The Scottish Government's much-maligned farm support IT system will come in for further fierce criticism today with the release of the latest Audit Scotland report, which states that the programme has failed to deliver value for money '“ or the planned benefits for farmers and crofters.

And while the initial phase of the £180 million CAP Futures programme might have ended, the report states that significant issues remain – highlighting the fact that not only is a further £33m likely to be required to develop the system but EU fines of up to £60m could also still result from the system’s poor performance.

• READ MORE: Farming news

Caroline Gardner, Auditor General for Scotland, said that the challenges of the system meant the Scottish Government had been left juggling multiple demands on its time and resources, which had impacted on its progress over the past year.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

She said that it was crucial that a full understanding of the system was handed over by the contractors to the staff in order for the system to be maintained and payments made on time for 2017.

“The Scottish Government also urgently needs to fully understand the financial risk it faces, so that it can target funding at ensuring the system is compliant and secure,” said Gardner.

While some improvements were noted in the farmers’ application process, both the system’s inability to pay out support measures on time and its lack of any tested disaster recovery plan drew considerable criticism in the report and from farming organisations.

NFU Scotland president Andrew McCornick said that farmers were already acutely aware of the failings highlighted in the damning report.

“Regrettably, we are no further forward in building the necessary trust and confidence in this system,” he said, adding that the apparent lack of a contingency plan for recovery in the event of complete breakdown in the system was a major issue.

“This report clearly shows that the system still requires much work and cost to get it up to the standard that we want and expect. I have no doubt that all the people now involved in the IT system are committed to getting it right. But how much longer will we have to wait?”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Union chief executive Scott Walker said that regardless of the current approach involving loans and part payments, the “fact of the matter” was that no-one had yet received their full basic payment or greening payment.

“Despite talks of 80 per cent loans and 90 per cent part payments, what some claimants have actually received is nowhere near this amount,” said Walker.

While admitting that further work remained necessary, cabinet secretary Fergus Ewing said that the report recognised improvements had been made – but he termed the disallowance risk “speculative”.

“All member states carry disallowance risks and are subject to financial penalty – Scotland is no different in that respect,” he said.