Aidan Smith: If tennis players like Naomi Osaka don’t like our questions we should throw in the towel

The questions lobbed at the world’s top tennis stars during Wimbledon can be as soft as the All-England Club towels. Indeed, during my first year of reporting on the tournament there was an American journalist who wanted to know if the players agreed that the purple and green ones used in SW19 were “iconic”.

Naomi Osaka at the French Open before her shock decision to withdraw from the tournament complaining of media negativity.

He asked this of everyone. Superstars and rookies, victors and the vanquished. Scores of players troop through the windowless press conference suite in the early rounds, so the rest of the reporters quickly became exasperated by their colleague who - they were sure - must have been employed by an ultra-niche “guest publication” of the type featured on Have I Got News For You - Towel Monthly, perhaps.

I mention this in the wake of Naomi Osaka’s volley of criticism of what she sees as journalists’ negative questions, which began with the world No 2 announcing a media no-show at the French Open which subsequently brought her a fine which was followed by the player quitting Roland Garros.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

Osaka later revealed mental health issues for not wanting to “subject myself to people that doubt me” and apologised for tarring all journos with the same brush. Now, I’m not privy to the Japanese’s state of mind and hope she gets over her problems, but in my experience of covering tennis these post-match press conferences are never spotlight-and-thumbscrews affairs. They can be as rigorous as having one’s back gently massaged with, yes, a luxuriously plump Wimbledon towel.

Read More

Read More
Naomi Osaka: Key questions around her withdrawal from French Open and what tenni...

The question to Rafael Nadal - “Rafa, could you please tell us about the watch you wear” - is one that has been stored away for the special day when I can deploy it, pinning my subject to the ground like the slavering hound many sportsmen and women view journalists to be, and claiming a Watergate-standard scoop.

Lots of athletes are thin-skinned but maybe tennis players more than most. Two years ago at Wimbledon Johanna Konta was asked about 34 unforced errors in her quarter-final defeat and whether she could have “perhaps” done better in key parts of the match. She exploded. “Is that your professional tennis opinion?” she hissed.

The questioner conceded he wasn’t at the elite level, merely “a spectator alongside everyone else at Centre Court willing you on”. Konta countered: “I don’t think you need to pick on me in a harsh way.” He tried again, suggesting she would presumably hope to learn from the defeat for future tournaments, whereupon he was accused of being “patronising” and “disrespectful”.

This was a poor performance from Konta, her second of the day. Doubtless in tennis - as in all sports - talking about a defeat minutes after it’s happened can be tough. The unspoken justification for these immediate interviews, of course, is the prospect of good drama, a rant or some tears. But at Wimbledon the BBC nab the players straight off the court. By the time we, the written press, get them they should have had time to process the match. If beginning a question “Perhaps … ” is provocative or insulting then we should all throw in the towel.

A message from the Editor:

Get a year of unlimited access to all of The Scotsman's sport coverage without the need for a full subscription. Expert analysis of the biggest games, exclusive interviews, live blogs, transfer news and 70 per cent fewer ads on - all for less than £1 a week. Subscribe to us today.


Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.