Comment: Glasgow Warriors must ask more questions of Connacht
A fortnight ago, Glasgow were also too often sloppy at the breakdown, affording their young scrum-half Ali Price very little protection. Andy Nicol was quite critical of his performance; I thought that, in the circumstances, he did pretty well. But if Glasgow are to win today, they surely have to tidy up this part of their game.
Being reduced to 14 men for the last half-hour didn’t help, of course, but thereafter Glasgow again didn’t seem to think as clearly as they usually do. They made little use of the strong wind behind them and so played far less of the game deep in Connacht territory than they should have done.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdIt was a disappointing defeat because, while Connacht are a very good team, one is pretty sure that, day-in day-out, Glasgow are a better one. It’s reasonable to say: cut out the mistakes and you’ll win today.
This may be so, but, bearing Connacht’s voracious defence in mind, they may have to play a different sort of game, one that asks other questions to make Connacht question themselves. The great American tennis champion Bill Tilden had an axiom: “never change a winning game; always change a losing one”. The Champions Cup final between Saracens and Racing92 offered a good example of the truth of this. It was a decidedly turgid affair, but Saracens, who won comfortably, were not to blame. They happened on a winning formula, with Owen Farrell and Richard Wigglesworth repeatedly pinning Racing back with astute and accurate kicking. In contrast, Racing persisted with trying to barge through and, even when they enjoyed a period of ascendancy, had no other idea than pick, go and drive. The trouble with the pick-and-go tactic is that you nearly always lose the ball eventually, or concede a penalty for holding on at the tackle.
No matter how intelligently Saracens played in that final, it really wasn’t much of an advertisement for northern hemisphere rugby. Admittedly, there were ten minutes of very heavy rain in the first half, and the ball was wet; nevertheless, no tries were scored and there were very few moments when a try seemed likely. Glasgow and Connacht will surely serve up better entertainment. There will be intense commitment from both sides but such commitment doesn’t necessarily exclude enterprise and imagination. I would guess that Glasgow want to move the Connacht pack about the field, especially in the first half. Their own game is based on pace, off-loading and support but, if they are to win, the handling must be more secure than in the last encounter.
Glasgow have had a remarkable season, given the international calls on their players. Their nine-match winning streak ended two weeks ago, but they have enough ability all over the field to take the opportunity of a final at Murrayfield. It will be hard going because Connacht, too, have had a season to remember. Their achievement has also been remarkable, all the more so when you consider how a dozen years or so ago, the IRFU were eager to close the club down.
Let’s hope the sun shines, the rain stays out in the Atlantic and the wind doesn’t blow, or not too hard anyway.