SPFL chairman sends letter to 42 SPFL clubs to 'set the record straight' on Rangers allegations, Championship vote and £9.3m payments

The SPFL have sought to address concerns regarding the resolution

SPFL chief executive Neil Doncaster has come in for criticism. Picture: SNS

SPFL chairman Murdoch MacLennan has sent a letter to the 42 clubs to address the controversy which has enveloped Scottish football in recent days.

The governing body has come in for severe criticism for its handling of the resolution to member clubs.

Sign up to our Football newsletter

Sign up to our Football newsletter

A vote to terminate the Championship, League One and League Two took place on Friday but mystery surrounds what happens next with two clubs having not yet voted.

One Championship team – believed to be Dundee – hold the casting vote whether the resolution passes or fails.

The SPFL faced stinging criticism for releasing a statement on Friday showing how the resolution is sitting with the votes which had been cast.

The Championship team had sent their vote in but it arrived after 5pm. By the time it was received the club had asked that it not be counted, according to MacLennan in his letter.

On top of this the SPFL received a complaint from Rangers, the Ibrox club questioning the competence of the organisation and calling for the suspension of chief executive Neil Doncaster.

They have made it known they have evidence but are refusing to present it until an independent investigation is launched.

The letter from MacLennan to all 42 SPFL clubs in full:

“I am writing to you all to correct significant misinformation appearing in the media.

“This misinformation is damaging to Scottish football as a whole – and to each and every member club of the SPFL.

“Several suggestions have been made in recent days about the treatment of a resolution requisition by Rangers FC, about fee payments to clubs, and about the votes cast by Ladbrokes Championship clubs.

“This letter is intended to set the record straight.

“It has been suggested that the Board rushed to get a resolution out to members.

“In fact, the dates and times of a number of recent SPFL Board meetings were delayed specifically to ensure that one director had the time that he needed to be able to reach a decision.

“The SPFL Board spent around an hour discussing in great detail the resolution requisitioned by Rangers.

“Only then did the Board, based on clear and unequivocal advice from a QC, determine that the resolution was not effective.

“The Rangers director on the Board confirmed that he was content with the time given over to that discussion.

“He was also offered the opportunity of the SPFL’s legal counsel Rod McKenzie working with Rangers’ Company Secretary on a resolution that might be effective.

“To date, no further requisition has come forward from Rangers or from any other SPFL member.

“It has been suggested that it is open to the SPFL Board to distribute end-of-season fee payments to clubs now, in the absence of league placings being finalised.

“That is simply not the case.

“For the Board to be able to authorise end-of-season fee payments to clubs (amounting to £9.3million gross), final league placings must be determined.

“Those who have suggested that the SPFL may make such payments, without a line being drawn under Season 2019/20, are wrong.Further, it has been suggested that all Ladbrokes Championship club votes were cast on Friday night.

“One Ladbrokes Championship club attempted to submit a voting slip, which did not reach the SPFL until late that evening.

“Earlier, at 6pm on Friday, that club had confirmed in writing to the SPFL that any attempted vote from that club should not be considered as cast.

“We have had a number of conversations with the chairman of that club over the weekend, in which he reiterated that his club had not yet voted on the SPFL resolution.The SPFL has proceeded on the basis of the unequivocal instruction from that club received at 6pm on Friday.

“At the time of writing, 40 of our 42 clubs have voted, with one Ladbrokes Championship club and one Ladbrokes League 1/League 2 club yet to cast a vote on the SPFL resolution.

“They have the remainder of the 28-day period to do so, should they wish.

“The current level of support for the Board resolution is 85% of clubs in favour.

“I have seen allegations made by the Rangers FC Interim Chairman Douglas Park, in a statement issued by Rangers at 3pm on Saturday, about the SPFL, its corporate governance, its culture, its office-bearers and its business operations.

“I wrote to Mr Park on Saturday evening, requesting any material to support these allegations.I regret to inform you that, at the time of writing, I have received nothing from Mr Park.

“It is difficult to understand why Mr Park should not wish to share this alleged material with me.

“I am entirely satisfied, based on all the information at my disposal, that the SPFL and its executives and legal advisers have acted wholly properly at every stage in this process.

“Should any member club have evidence to the contrary they should bring it to me – indeed, I would argue they have a duty to do so – and I will deal with it in an entirely even-handed way.

“To do otherwise is harmful to the standing, performance and effective operation of the SPFL and runs counter to the wider interests of our game.

“Yours sincerely,

“Murdoch MacLennan, Chairman”

Read More

Read More
Scottish football civil war erupts as Rangers take aim at SPFL