Along with Hearts and Stranraer, both condemned to relegation as a consequence of the controversial vote which passed the resolution, Rangers lodged a requisition calling for a general meeting of all 42 SPFL clubs.
The SPFL held a board meeting by videoconference on Monday evening and have now scheduled the EGM for 14 days’ time, the soonest it can take place under their articles of association.
Rangers managing director Stewart Robertson, an SPFL board member, was asked to recuse himself from Monday’s meeting while the requisition was discussed.
The Ibrox club say they have a ‘dossier of evidence’ with regards to ‘bullying and coercion’ of clubs in the build-up to the ballot on the SPFL’s resolution which was eventually passed by Dundee voting ‘Yes’ after withdrawing an earlier ‘No’ vote.
Rangers, who have called for the suspension of SPFL chief executive Neil Doncaster and legal counsel Rod McKenzie, have promised to supply the evidence to all member clubs ‘well in advance’ of the EGM.
In order for Rangers to succeed in approving an external independent investigation into their allegations of misgovernance by the SPFL’s executive, they will need the backing of 31 other clubs at the EGM.
The resolution requires 75 percent support of clubs in each of the Premiership and Championship along with 75 percent support from clubs in League 1 and League 2 combined. That’s a minimum of nine Premiership clubs, eight Championship clubs and 15 clubs from League 1 and 2.
The SPFL last Friday revealed details of what they claimed was a ‘comprehensive and independent investigation’ into the chronology of Dundee’s ‘missing vote’, carried out by auditors Deloitte on the instruction of chairman Murdoch MacLennan and independent non-executive director Karyn McCluskey.
It declared there had been ‘no evidence of improper behaviour by SPFL personnel’. Unsurprisingly, this failed to satisfy Rangers who were immediately critical of the narrow scope of the SPFL’s investigation.
They are calling for an independent investigation to look into a series of issues, including why the SPFL announced a tally of votes before every club had submitted their ballot paper and why Dundee were allowed to vote a second time after their initial ballot, which would have sunk the resolution, was disregarded.
Rangers are also questioning the ‘interaction of SPFL executives with clubs during the voting process’ and the ‘compliance of SPFL directors with statutory and common law duties’.
A message from the Editor:Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit https://www.scotsman.com/subscriptions now to sign up.
Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.