Vote on Brexit ‘plan Bs’ could lead to deeper deadlock - Paris Gourtsoyannis

Tuesday represents the best - and possibly the last - chance for MPs to influence the course of Brexit and prevent a damaging no-deal departure from the EU, explains Paris Gourtsoyannis
Theresa May faces yet another crucial vote on Brexit in the CommonsTheresa May faces yet another crucial vote on Brexit in the Commons
Theresa May faces yet another crucial vote on Brexit in the Commons

When Theresa May’s Brexit deal was put to the Commons two weeks ago, all its critics had to do was to say no - and they did in huge numbers, from both sides of the House, inflicting a historic 230-vote defeat on the government.

Now they have to say what should happen instead, and it isn’t clear that any option can command a majority in the Commons and point a way out of the deadlock.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Two proposals are attracting the most attention and support, and they come from opposite sides of the Brexit debate.

Read More
MPs told no deal Brexit ‘not an option’

Labour MP Yvette Cooper has drawn cross-party backing from MPs of both a pro-EU persuasion, or who want to see a soft Brexit inside the single market and customs union like Conservative Nick Boles. It would clear the Commons schedule on 5 February to allow debate on a piece of legislation known as EU Withdrawal Bill no3.

If passed, the bill would set a deadline of 26 February to get a Brexit deal through the Commons. If the government failed to meet that target, MPs would get a vote on extending Article 50 and delaying Brexit by up to nine months.

Brexiteer critics claim the length of the delay is effectively blocking the UK’s departure from the EU, and significantly, while Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell said it was “highly likely” to get support from the Labour front bench, a firm commitment hasn’t yet been made. Another issue is that a nine month delay extend beyond European elections and the swearing-in of a new set of MEPs in July.

Even if the amendment passes, the bid to prevent no-deal through delay faces difficulty: while the UK can revoke Article 50 unilaterally, it needs unanimous agreement of the other 27 EU governments to extend it. Lithuanian president Dalia Grybauskait said last week that no-deal would be “better” than further delay, and EU sources have been widely quoted saying an extension won’t be agreed without clear indications it would lead to a deal - not more dithering.

From the Brexiteer side, an amendment tabled by Conservative Andrew Murrison and the chairman of the powerful Tory backbench 1922 Committee, Sir Graham Brady looks likely to get the backing of the government.

In calls for the controversial ‘backstop’ insurance policy guaranteeing the status quo along the Irish border “to be replaced with alternative arrangements to avoid a hard border”.

If passed, it would represent a direct challenge to the EU to either do what it says is impossible, and re-open the Brexit withdrawal agreement, or at least attach a ‘codicil’ to the document setting out that the backstop would only be temporary.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

However, a number of MPs on the Brexiteer European Research Group have said they won’t back the amendment because it’s too vague, and doesn’t come directly from government. With the margins so tight in the Commons, even a few missing votes could result mean defeat for either amendment.

Failure to pass any of the 14 amendments put forward by MPs - Commons Speaker John Bercow will decide how many are taken forward for vote early tomorrow - would throw the country into even deeper limbo.

The UK could be left with a take it or leave it choice on a Brexit deal that MPs have already overwhelmingly rejected, with a matter of weeks until a no-deal cliff edge.