Top scientists ‘oppose WHO’ and back e-cigarettes

A GROUP of leading scientists has ­appealed to world health bosses not to clamp down on e-cigarettes.

E-cigarettes have sparked controversy among experts. Picture: Getty

A total of 53 experts from 15 countries, including the UK, wrote to the World Health ­Organisation (WHO) to urge it not to “control and suppress” the devices, saying they have the potential to save millions of lives.

WHO is set to publish recommendations about e-cigarettes to governments later this year.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

The letter urged the global health adviser not to impose regulations on the products in the same way it does with conventional cigarettes.

It said: “The potential for tobacco harm-reduction products to reduce the burden of smoking-related disease is very large, and these products could be among the most significant health innovations of the 21st century – perhaps saving hundreds of millions of lives.

“The urge to control and suppress them as tobacco products should be resisted and instead regulation that is fit for purpose and designed to realise the ­potential should be championed by WHO.”

The authors published the letter after claiming to have seen a leaked document from WHO which labelled e-cigarettes as a “threat”.

Professor Robert West, from University College London, who was one of the signatories, said: “For WHO to suggest that e-cigarettes are as risky as other tobacco products would send an erroneous and bleak message to the millions of current e-cigarette users who have used them to quit smoking.

“It would discourage smokers from trying them and we would miss out on a major opportunity to reduce smoke-related deaths globally.”

Professor Gerry Stimson, emeritus professor at Imperial College London, said: “If WHO gets its way and extinguishes e-cigarettes, it will not only have passed up what is clearly one of the biggest public health innovations of the last three decades that could potentially save millions of lives.”

Research published last week by Prof West found that e-cigarettes can help improve the success rate of people trying to quit smoking by 60 per cent, compared to nicotine patches or gum.

Critics said not enough is known about the long-term effects of the devices, which ­deliver nicotine in a vapour.

The British Medical Association has backed calls for regulation of the devices.

Its director of professional activities, Vivienne Nathanson, said there was evidence that children who had never smoked were starting to use e-cigarettes.

She said: “Rather like cigarettes in the Fifties and Sixties, we really need to look at that and, I believe, ban it [advertising].”

Dr Penny Woods, chief executive of the British Lung Foundation, said: “The concern is that the safety and effectiveness of e-cigarettes is still unknown”

A WHO spokesman said the organisation was working on e-cigarette recommendations. He added: “We are also working with national regulatory bodies to look at regulatory options, as well as toxicology experts, to understand more about the possible impact of e-cigarettes and similar devices on health.”