North Sea helicopter crashed after pilots confused by ‘illusions’

A SUPER Puma helicopter, with 18 people on board, plunged into the North Sea only 300 yards from an offshore installation after the two pilots on board became disorientated in the pitch dark and low cloud, a new report has found.

Neither were aware that their chopper was descending towards the sea after a vital height warning system had been switched off, the UK government’s Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB) said.

It found the crewmen’s perception of the position and orientation of their helicopter had probably been affected by the reflection of the platform on the surface of the sea as they approached it.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Both pilots and the 16 oil workers on board the Bond-operated aircraft miraculously survived unscathed after the Super Puma crashed into the icy waters of the North Sea on 18 February, 2009, as they made a landing approach to BP’s Eastern Trough Area Project (ETAP) platform, 125 miles east of Aberdeen.

All 18 men managed to scramble into the helicopter’s liferafts and were picked up by the crew of a high-speed support vessel and a search-and-rescue helicopter.

Keith Conradi, AAIB chief inspector of air accidents, who wrote the 117-page report, made 27 safety recommendations, including the need for all helicopter operators to make optimum use of automatic flight control systems, the adoption of new lighting standards for platform helidecks, and a review of height warning systems on all North Sea helicopters.

The inspectors also recommended that the Civil Aviation Authority commissions a study into the visual illusions that may be generated during approaches to offshore installations.

The Super Puma EC225, commanded by Captain Mike Tweedie, crashed while on a crew change flight from Aberdeen airport to the ETAP platform. As the helicopter approached the platform, the weather conditions deteriorated, with a cloud base of only 500ft.

The AAIB report said: “The approach was conducted in reduced visibility, probably due to fog or low cloud. This degraded the visual clues provided by the platform lighting, adding to the strength of the visual illusions during the final approach.

“There was no specified night visual approach profile on which the crew could base their approach and minimum heights.

“The visual approach on final approach was possibly confused by a reflection of the platform on the surface of the sea.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“The presence of fog could have introduced a sensation of being too high, and again this aspect of the visual scene could have confirmed an oculogravic illusion.”

Bill Munro, Bond managing director, said: “All recommendations immediately relevant to Bond, based on the AAIB’s two Special Bulletins in 2009, have already been fully implemented. The final report does not require any further actions by Bond.

“We await further direction, if any, from the European Aviation Safety Agency and the Civil Aviation Authority, following recommendations relevant to them in the final report.”

Related topics: