SPTC's examples of 'box ticking'

A FATHER of a physically disabled child boards the school bus every day to fasten his daughter's seatbelt.

However, under the new rules, he will have to undergo full disclosure for criminal and other background checks to make sure he is safe to be around youngsters. If he refuses, he will be banned from the bus.

Checks for all – but no children

A GROUP of parents may wish to hire a school hall outside school hours for a fundraising event. Under the previous rules that would have presented no problem.

But now, if the local authority adopts a strict interpretation of the new rules, officials may insist that every person attending undergo the checks even if there will be no children on the school premises at that time.

Cost of disclosure stretches funds

PARENTS' groups often have limited resources and any funds they do raise are often for important equipment for the school or pupil trips.

However, some groups fear officious local authorities may insist each member of a parent council or parent teachers' association be checked. And if cash-strapped councils insist those groups pay for the checks that could prove costly and deter people from volunteering.

Shortage of numbers for chaperoning

SCHOOLS are often dependent on parents helping out as chaperones on trips, as there are legal limits on the ratio of adults to children, dependent on age.

However, if every parent going on such a trip, even if just an hour long, has to go through lengthy and intrusive background checks many fewer will be willing to help.

With cuts in teacher numbers, schools may find they have to cancel trips.