Unionists 'censored' in debate on constitution

Salmond's National Conversation, a key part of SNP's drive towards an independence referendum, has become embroiled in controversy after it emerged pro-Union contributions are not being included in an online debate on the constitution.

The SNP was accused of "manipulating" the constitutional debate by Labour MSP Lord Foulkes, after one frustrated contributor made an official complaint.

Foulkes says he will write to the Scottish Information Commissioner to bring the case to his attention.

One of the rejected submissions, from an unnamed pensioner, spoke of the view he once held that it was a good idea to exaggerate the differences between "being British and Scottish" at the least opportunity.

But he added: "Since then I have had to reconsider my position and have found my sentiments becoming more aligned to being a member of the United Kingdom living in Scotland."

Another of his arguments denied entry on to the website questioned how an independent Scotland would fund itself through taxation.

Foulkes said: "I think he is probably one of quite a few people who have experienced similar problems.

"This shows the way the SNP is trying to manipulate the debate. Alex Salmond knows the vast majority of people in Scotland favour devolution – which gives us the best of both worlds – but are against splitting up the United Kingdom."

A spokesman for the First Minister claimed the National Conversation was more inclusive than the Calman Commission, the body set up to look at the constitution by Labour, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats.

He said: "The National Conversation is open to everyone – including Lord George Foulkes. (It] includes comments in favour of and against independence."