No '˜institutional racism' in police stop and search

Anas Sarwar said he would not be deterred from campaigning against racism. Picture: John DevlinAnas Sarwar said he would not be deterred from campaigning against racism. Picture: John Devlin
Anas Sarwar said he would not be deterred from campaigning against racism. Picture: John Devlin
An independent group of experts has accused Labour MSP Anas Sarwar of misrepresenting stop and search data to claim black and Asian people are more likely to be targeted by police.

The Scottish Police Federation (SPF) said Mr Sarwar was “playing the race card” when he issued a press release on Monday suggesting those from ethnic minority communities are four times more likely to be stop-searched than their white counterparts.

The Independent Advisory Group on Stop and Search said the evidence did not substantiate that claim. Led by John Scott, QC, the group’s work was instrumental in leading to the outlawing of non-statutory (or “consensual”) stop and search, which had been used to target children. As a result of its work, a six-monthly review of statutory stop and search is being carried out by Susan McVie, a criminologist at Edinburgh University.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Mr Sarwar was accused by David Hamilton, SPF vice-chairman, of “wilfully presenting inconclusive data to insinuate racism” after he issued a press release saying police officers are “disproportionately targeting ethnic minorities”.

Professor McVie said the Labour press release had not taken account of a number of caveats in the report about drawing reliable conclusions based on population data.

She said: “I clearly stated in the report that the search rate for some non-white ethnic groups appeared to be higher than that for white people.

“However, we advised caution in comparing rates across different ethnic groups for a number of technical reasons. It is not credible to conclude that there is an inflated rate of search for specific minority ethnic groups based on these data.”

She added: “The claim that search rates for people from black and Asian backgrounds are four times higher than those for white people is wrong and demonstrates a lack of understanding in how to use and interpret this type of information. When looking at black and Asian people combined, the rate of search is 2.8 per 1,000 people – only a fraction higher than the rate for white people at 2.7 per 1,000.”

Responding to suggestions that positive searches were lower for those coming from minority backgrounds, Prof McVie said the differences could be explained by factors others than race. She said accusations about institutional racism in policing were “unfair and unsubstantiated” if based solely on her data.

Writing on Twitter, Calum Steele, general secretary of the SPF, said: “It is difficult to conclude anything other than this whole sorry saga was anything other than a premeditated insidious attack on the reputations of hard-working police officers purely for political advantage.”

A spokesman for Scottish Labour said there had been errors in the original data, which “dramatically inflated” the rate of stop-searches among the Asian population. “We welcome the publication of an amendment to the figures, and publication of the correct figures.”