Ashley Graczyk: Why I quit as Tory councillor and now back independence

Over a period of a year as a Scottish Conservative councillor, there were three things that had radically transformed my political views about Scottish independence from No to Yes.
Ashley Graczyk celebrates with Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson after being elected as a Tory councillor (Picture: Neil Hanna)Ashley Graczyk celebrates with Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson after being elected as a Tory councillor (Picture: Neil Hanna)
Ashley Graczyk celebrates with Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson after being elected as a Tory councillor (Picture: Neil Hanna)

The first is the impact of Conservative policies on people and communities. As a new Edinburgh councillor, I saw with my own eyes the impact the Conservative policies, especially those relating to the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) and welfare, had on the local people and communities.

I have lost count of the amount of times I have met with various disabled people and those in difficulties who have been immensely impacted by the DWP at local level. I, personally, have seen people reduced to tears because of Universal Credit, PIP (Personal Independence Payment), Access to Work and the Access to Elected Office Fund (UK).

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

I also speak, from personal experience, that the Access to Work application and assessment process is far too bureaucratic, obstructive and is no longer fit for purpose. Quite frankly, it is a horrible process and many charities have the same concerns.

The final straw was when I received an email from a team member of the Government Equalities Office in response to my open letter to the Minister for Women and Equalities. I had shared my delight in the Access to Elected Office Fund (UK) being reinstated for a year and urged the Minster to make it permanent. I also shared briefly how grateful I was for the support I received from the Access to Elected Office Fund (Scotland) and the positive impact it had on my campaign.

The UK Government acknowledged there were certain barriers, but they also stated that the Access to Elected Office (UK) was being wound up and that the political parties were expected to have ultimate responsibility to meet extra costs for disabled candidates. I’m concerned the UK Government wants to shift the responsibility for costly, unreasonable adjustments to political parties, like they do to employers with Access to Work and, like some employers, some political parties would not have a sustainable budget to meet the costly support needed.

Read More
Union Jack flag-waving councillor to join SNP weeks after leaving Tories

This would put a cap on disabled people’s ambitions to get into public and political life and certain types of work from anywhere in the UK.

The second reason is the UK Government itself. In June 2017, I witnessed a snap General Election with an unlevel playing field and a clear disadvantage for disabled candidates, thanks to the UK Government’s decision to not release the Access to Elected Office Fund (UK). I witnessed disabled people throughout the UK who would have loved to but were unable to stand as MP candidates, including Scottish candidates, as they could not afford the support needed thanks to the Access to Elected Office Fund UK being reserved (had it been devolved, it is likely the Scottish candidates would have had received funding from the Scottish Government).

Some of the political parties did not have the sustainable budget to provide, nor had the time to fundraise for a snap election. Those that did manage had to pay extra on top of the campaign itself. This example made me wonder if the same could potentially happen to the Access to Elected Office Fund (Scotland) if the Scottish Conservatives ever got elected into the Scottish Government. All this demonstrates what life is like for disabled people under the current UK Government.

It also made me wonder, what kind of society do I want to live in – a society under a selfish Government that looks for any excuse to not support disabled or vulnerable people and favours the rich? Or a society where together, we can work for the removal of barriers to people’s economic, social, and civic inclusion, and to promote our rights, choices and voices, as full and equal citizens?

I decided to resign from the Conservative party because I refused to give up our right to participate in work, politics and in society on an equal, level playing field under the current UK Government that wants to remove or alter policies that puts a cap on our ambitions.

The third reason is my belief in self-governance.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Along with all the other City of Edinburgh councillors, we have the privilege to govern the Capital city of Scotland, and in my first year as a councillor I saw with my own eyes how we run our city via the council. We also received some insight into the various roles MSPs and MPs have due to working cross-government on various issues.

Over time, it became more glaringly obvious to me the absurdity of reserved matters being dealt with by Westminster and not by the Scottish Government (bear in mind I voted No in the 2014 independence referendum), as Scotland is capable of governing on reserved matters too. I became more convinced that Scotland needs political independence to build a different and better Scotland.

I have been brought up with the UK as my country, and all my life I had seen the whole of the UK as my homeland. I don’t want to see new borders as I’m about finding new and practical ways to break down barriers and unite people as central to one of my progressive values.

But I came to the realisation that to preserve and protect the values we have in Scotland, we cannot have policies imposed on us from Westminster that jar with the kind of Scotland we are trying to build.

So simply, we need independence. Scotland’s traditional liberal values of freedom, tolerance, equality, and individual rights need to be protected. It was a question of which values were more important for me to serve in my ward, after all I campaigned under the vision of ‘Communities that Work for Everyone’ and I believe the Conservatives and UK Government cannot deliver that aspiration.

What I personally struggled to come to terms with, was that for Scotland to get political independence we need to break up my homeland. We need to break up the old Union which does not work with devolution and work together as a new ‘Union of Independent Nations’, as equals cooperating with our UK neighbours on an equal footing while the Scottish people control their own destiny.

I believe it is time for Scotland to have political independence, to self-govern with the full freedom to build and shape Scotland’s future with our own hands – to make it the kind of country we want it to be and the kind of Government we want to have (one with a caring heart!).

Yes, I freely admit we need to find new and practical solutions such as, the kind of currency we will have, the kind of central bank, and so on, but we can work, discuss, debate and share ideas together to find these solutions and turn the vision of an independent Scotland into reality. Heck, if we can invent televisions, telephones, penicillin and insulin – to name a few – surely, we can create ways to self-govern our country? Didn’t these inventions all start with a vision from those could imagine a different future?

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The increasingly safe and sensible choice seems to be for Scotland to stay at the heart of Europe, independent and in control of our own destiny. It is time to embrace Yes with full confidence in our future.