Parents must ask to receive safer vaccine

DOCTORS have been told to come clean about Infanrix, the safer whooping cough jab available on the NHS - but only if directly challenged about it by parents.

The compromise means that parents who ask no questions will have their children injected with the cheaper DTwP jab laced with ethyl mercury - a substance ordered out of US medicine on health grounds.

The deal was met with political outrage yesterday as Scotland’s opposition parties accused the Scottish Executive of skirting around its duty to give parents the full facts about vaccination options before going ahead.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Dr Andrew Fraser, Scotland’s deputy chief medical officer, has written an "urgent message" to Scottish medical specialists alerting them to fears around thimerosal, a controversial vaccine preservative 50 per cent composed of mercury.

The substance is contained in DTwP, the 10-a-shot jab from France which protects against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, or whooping cough, routinely given to all babies aged two, three and four months.

Its rival is Infanrix, a UK vaccine available on the NHS to the few parents who know to ask for it by name. It is almost twice the price because it comes without the so-called "junk cells" suspected of giving children fever after injection.

It is also made without thimerosal - and is the type of vaccine routinely used in the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia and South Korea.

"Parents are entitled to know if thimerosal is contained in the vaccine available to them," Dr Fraser’s letter said. "They should be aware of the reason for this - ethyl mercury is an essential component of the most effective vaccine available to protect children."

The Executive explained that this "entitlement" only extends to parents who ask if they have an alternative. Those who do not will be given the mercury vaccine.

"The DTwP is recommended, because it is more effective. So that is the one which is given. If parents were to ask a question, for whatever reason, they would be told everything - about the choice, the side-effects, whatever they wanted to know."

The Scotsman revealed yesterday that babies injected with the cheaper DTwP vaccine are ten times as likely to suffer side effects ranging from fever to periods of unusual crying lasting more than an hour.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In a Holyrood debate yesterday, Frank McAveety, Scotland’s deputy health minister, admitted that Infanrix does have "lower levels of side effects" - but said it was less effective.

"Our recommendation is that, on the balance of risk, DTwP offers the best protection against whooping cough. Each individual or family will have to make those choices in consultation with their medical practitioners."

Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP’s health spokeswoman, said this is meaningless if parents are not being told that Infanrix exists.

"Choice can only be exercised if parents have the information to make that choice," she said. "There will be no consultation if doctors do not pro-actively lay out the options."

Mary Scanlon, the Tories’ health spokeswoman, asked Mr McAveety to publish the performance data for both vaccines - saying that only this could let parents decide which is best for their children.

The thimerosal debate has swept the US, where parents are now suing drug companies. They are fast building evidence that the ethyl mercury induced autism in their children.

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts, a Tory peer, raised the issue in the House of Lords on Wednesday night, calling for ministers "to follow a long list of developed countries and remove thimerosal from vaccines forthwith".

Thimerosal has not survived any public debate in any country. The Scottish Executive has said it will soon publish the figures it uses to argue that the mercury vaccine is better.

Related topics: