Why Hiroshima?
When I visited the museum at the Peace Memorial Park in the city earlier this year I picked up a leaflet about the bombing. It claimed Hiroshima was chosen by the US for the attack because it did not have a prisoner-of-war camp. Of course, historians will be divided on the details of politics and military strategy in the Second World War conflict with Japan. Some say the attack was necessary because of the intransigence of Emperor Hirohito and his military establishment; others will say it was not necessary because a surrender to General McArthur and his US forces was not far away.
But the leaflet appeared to me to be a symptom of a nation still in denial about some of its own wartime atrocities. Some of these have been vividly depicted in Eric Lomax’s book The Railway Man. They describe brutal wrongs that still need a lot of explanation. The anniversary of Hiroshima will prompt, rightly, a close examination of the efficacy of nuclear weapons. It should remind us, too, not just of the sufferings of the the hibakusha but the damage to those who were the victims of Japanese military excesses.
Bob Taylor
Shiel Court
Glenrothes