Liquid asset

We have heard much from the No campaign about the volatile oil price and the prospect of dwindling supplies.

If it is such a negligible
resource, why not give the revenues to Scotland, along with crystal clear details of the promised extra powers?

From the point of view of rUK, a seriously dwindling resource is water. There is more water in Loch Ness than in the whole of England, and London tap water has been filtered through several people before it reaches a glass.

In the not too distant future, there is every prospect of another pipeline carrying another Scottish resource south, for free.

While I’d be the last
person to wish our friends down south to go thirsty, could the No campaign please dry up about Scotland benefiting from the altogether intangible UK dividend.

Joseph G Miller

Dunfermline