One risk perceived to the group’s prospects would be changes in the “availability of public funding”.
This shows the accepted business model is that bus and rail transport are a “public good”.
Taxpayers are expected to subsidise buses and trains because it benefits the community as a whole.
Isn’t it incumbent upon free market economists as part of the independence debate to challenge this?
Say, for example, subsidies for luxury coach intercity services were to be withdrawn by the government.
What is the benefit to the whole community (all tax- payers) of government subsidies for these services?
Can this kind of “public transport” service be justified as a “public good” and therefore subsidised?
Arguably it isn’t because of “market failure” public transport is subsidised as free market fundamentalism hasn’t been tried.
Old Chapel Walk