He compounds this error by failing to define these “enhancements” to Scottish government, yet he expects Scots to abandon positive self-determination in return for this nebulous – and, frankly, patronising – nonsense.
In truth, he should be asking us what we are prepared to accept as absolute minimum conditions for agreeing to stay in the Union – that mutually fruitful 300-year-old co-operation that has brought us to the reality of burgeoning foodbanks and rampant social inequality.
I suspect he has deliberately left his “peace offering” until too near the actual referendum to allow investigation of suitable “concessions” for retaining the status quo. But one change he could propose at any time would be relocation of the office of Secretary of State for Scotland to the Scottish Government. That would remove the lingering suspicion that Westminster still regards Scotland as some outlying dependency.
Tranent, East Lothian