Date line

Steuart Campbell’s observation about the numerical uniqueness of yesterday’s date (Letters, 11 December) is incorrect.

My father-in-law who died a few weeks ago, aged 102, was fortunate to witness two sequences of 9.10.11 (aged eight months and 100) and 10.11.12 (aged one and 101). If had lived a little longer he would have made it to his second 11.12.13. As to the assertion that there can never be another such sequence, if I hang on in there to 161 I will be able to celebrate the 11 December 2113 in much the same way… by writing to The Scotsman!

Sign up to our Opinion newsletter

Sign up to our Opinion newsletter

Andrew Davey, Peebles