Cough up, Merkel

The present bout of euroscepticism among MPs is not really surprising considering that the selling of what would become the European Union was a hard job in the first place for poor old Harold Macmillan back in 1961 and for Edward Heath in the early 1970s.

In effect, the country that had won the Second World War was being asked to get into bed – albeit on a commercial basis – with those who had let it down, changed sides or caused mass 
ruination for six years.

What possible use was such an arrangement to Britain? None, of course.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

And that was the answer then, just as it is now, when German Chancellor Angela Merkel 
suggests that as a condition of 
financial help for eurozone countries, those countries should surrender their economies to the control of the European Union. That “surrender” word was a bad choice.

In 1946, Winston Churchill made a notable speech in Zurich, calling for a kind of United States of Europe, and this idea was well received by many as a means by which peace might be maintained after the appalling experience of two wars in Europe in less than 50 years.

Germany was quick to see that this was another way of dominating Europe, now that simple invasion had become unfashionable, and could not wait to sign up.

Many eurosceptics simply want to know why Chancellor Merkel can’t now just do the 
decent thing, and pick up the cost of the collapse of the euro, as an acknowledgement that the EU and the euro only came about in the first place to prevent a repetition of her country’s historic attitude towards its neighbours.

This is an unspoken question that political correctness prevents us from asking, and in today’s times nobody actually expects Germany to cough up.

But if they did, what a real 
gesture that would be from a country whose opinionated and constant self-interest has become just plain tiresome.

Malcolm Parkin

Gamekeepers Road

Kinnesswood, Kinross