Civic pride

There have been several opinions expressed over the identity of Scots in relation to their sense of Britishness. Robert Veitch (Letters, 26 May) argues that "my objection to nationalism … is that it engenders enmity between people".

Mr Veitch appears to make reference to Scottish nationalism and the cause for independence. The problem with the debate and opinions being expressed, not just from Mr Veitch but also from others, is the apparent "either one or the other" over whether Scots regard themselves as British.

This entirely misses the point. The cause for Scottish independence does regard to our sense of identity, as Scots should choose what is best for Scotland, but it is largely about a choice. This choice is about whether we want to see a nation, where nationality or identity is not the fundamental driving issue, about what kind of country Scots want to see themselves in.

Independence would give us the ability to build on a sustainable future in an increasingly unpredictable and globalised world through fiscal autonomy, building on our potential for our green energies and making decisions about important issues around us such as protecting our environment and for instance not allowing nuclear weapons to be based on Gare Loch; where we can advocate peace.

This is civic nationalism and in this vision for an independent Scotland, who said Britain or British identity would have to end?

It is surely only about creating a healthier future, one which moves on and plans effectively and focuses on real issues such as creating a sustainable future: which is ultimately a choice for the Scottish people.

JACK FRASER

Ladys Walk

Darnick, Melrose

I am unclear as to why Colin Wilson (Letters, 27 May) thinks I am advocating "tribalism". There are indeed regional "antipathies" within Britain, which is natural in any country, but I want the ancient nation of Scotland to reclaim its political independence. (I realise this will be circumscribed by alliances and treaties, but will be very happy with that currently enjoyed by, say, Denmark or the Netherlands). A weightier matter than "Tyke v Lancastrian" rivalry.

For the avoidance of doubt, it was not me who claimed that the English "neither know nor care about Scotland", but Dr Eamonn Butler (Opinion, 24 May), and one need not be "well-travelled" to confirm this. Just as far as your TV set or newsagent.

DAVID ROCHE

Forest Way

Blairgowrie, Perthshire