Capital's trams will be worth waiting for

Although he says little new or evidenced, I am happy to clarify the position on trams for Allan Alstead (Open Letter to Jenny Dawe, 16 February).

The economic justification for the tram project has never been more compelling. Cities that continue to develop during the global recession will emerge stronger. Henderson Global has indicated that its 850 million St James Quarter plans have been influenced by the advent of trams. Tiger Developments' continuing interest in Haymarket is also inspired, in part, by it being directly on the tram route. Trams to the Waterfront, to the west of the city and the airport are vital factors for the expected regeneration and growth in these areas.

Projected passenger figures for the tram project are based on detailed forecasts for the next 25 to 30 years. By 2031, annual demand for the current phase of the tram system is expected to have reached 25.5m. Edinburgh's bus service is excellent but it cannot cope with this growth.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

I do agree with Mr Alstead that a state of the art transport system requires to be integrated. That is why Lothian Buses and Edinburgh Trams will operate as a single integrated network, including common ticketing and seamless interchange between trams and buses. Tickets for tram journeys will cost the same as those for Lothian Buses. Concessionary fares are expected to replicate the national scheme in place when tram operations commence.

Yes, it would have been ideal if an underground power supply for Princes Street had been financially and practically feasible. The decision to use an overhead cable power supply followed discussion and consultation with stakeholders. It reflected experience and evidence on reliability and good practice in Paris, Montpellier, Nottingham and Manchester.

Mr Alstead voiced particular concerns about the single tram stop on Princes Street. While we may look at tram stop location in the future, the current design was determined as most suitable given each tram vehicle is almost the length of an Olympic-size swimming pool.

Suggesting that passengers will experience a "clanking journey" by tram is proof of Mr Alstead's lack of knowledge of modern trams. Unlike the old noisy, uncomfortable, cumbersome vehicles that traversed Edinburgh, modern trams are sleek, accessible and quiet.

Finally, Mr Alstead quotes "authoritative sources" on the costs of the project. Where's the substance? Where is his evidence to give credibility to the figure he mentions? Legal and commercial aspects of the complicated dispute process in which we are embroiled prevent me from publicly disclosing budget information. However, I can categorically state that I have no knowledge of the figure Mr Alstead cites.

I would reassure Mr Alstead no effort is being spared in delivering trams for Edinburgh.

This tram scheme is right for our growing city. Our integrated tram and bus network will be of enormous benefit to those living and working in Edinburgh and those seeking to invest in, or relocate to, Scotland's wonderful capital city.

(CLLR) JENNY DAWE

Leader

City of Edinburgh Council

Related topics: