HS2: Prospects of three-hour Scotland-London train journeys fade as Scottish and UK governments do their own thing – Alastair Dalton

When Britain’s current high-speed rail plans were first proposed more than a decade ago, Scotland was at the heart of the scheme, yet since then it has been the most problematic part.

Network Rail’s vision 12 years ago, which pre-dated the UK government’s HS2 project now underway, saw a London to Edinburgh/Glasgow line as the best value for money option.

A dedicated HS2 line will currently be built only as far as north west England, but the Scottish government lobbied hard from the start for further sections to be built or existing lines upgraded so high-speed trains could connect Scotland’s two biggest cities with London in three hours, compared to around four-and-a-half hours at present.

Minsters’ keenness soon turned to frustration because of the lack of progress, with the then Infrastructure Secretary Nicola Sturgeon vowing in 2012 that she wouldn't wait for Westminster to bring high-speed rail to Scotland and would build a line here by 2024.

A deal was reached in 2016 for the Scottish and UK governments to work towards three-hour journeys, and things seemed to back on course – until a surprise revelation at a high-speed rail conference I chaired in Edinburgh in October that this collaborative work had been halted.

A Transport Scotland official, who seemed as frustrated as Ms Sturgeon had been nine years ago, told the meeting he had been instructed to stop this work in 2019.

He said: “The UK government hasn’t stopped working on cross-Border activity. But Transport Scotland, from being in a place of one of the leaders of the agenda, is now not part of what’s going on.”

The Scottish government did not dispute that when I wrote a story about it days later.

The first HS2 trains are expected to carry passengers between 2029 and 2033

Scottish Conservatives transport spokesperson Graham Simpson, who was also at the conference, raised the issue at First Minister’s Questions, referring to the UK government’s Union connectivity review into improving UK transport links, noting the two governments had “agreed to develop options” for three-hour journeys.

However, Ms Sturgeon told him the alleged instruction to halt work “is just not the case”.

When Mr Simpson later requested the First Minister correct the Official Record (of Holyrood proceedings), transport minister Graeme Dey wrote back: “It is misleading to suggest officials have been instructed to stop working to reduce cross-Border journey times.

Read More

Read More
Transport Scotland official in ‘extraordinary’ outburst at agency halting high-s...
HS2 trains between London and Scotland would run on dedicated tracks (coloured dark blue, purple and orange) before continuing north on the west coast main line (light blue). HS2's eastern arm to Leeds (orange) was shelved last month. Picture: HS2 Ltd

“I have engaged with UK government ministers to discuss cross-Border, high-speed rail options, and Transport Scotland officials have continued to engage with UK government rail franchisee, West Coast Partnership, which is instructed by the

UK government, to prepare plans for cross-Border services coming from HS2.”

I understand the discussion includes about where HS2 will join the west coast main line north of Manchester, and plans for a depot in the Annandale area of Dumfries and Galloway.

Transport Scotland said its high-speed rail work was now continuing as part of its latest strategic transport projects review, whose recommendations are due to be published by February.

But if the agency is now doing this work separately from its Whitehall counterpart, could we end up back at square one when the findings come out, especially as HS2 has just been truncated with the removal of its eastern leg to Leeds that would have potentially connected to the east coast main line and Scotland?

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article.

We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.