COP26 climate change summit: IPCC should publish submissions from governments trying to influence scientific reports – Scotsman comment
For example, oil giant Saudi Arabia predictably took issue with the IPCC line that the “focus of decarbonisation efforts in the energy-systems sector needs to be on rapidly shifting to zero-carbon sources and actively phasing out fossil fuels”.
And Norway, another oil producer, argued carbon-capture-and-storage should be treated as a more significant prospect. The IPCC’s draft report does say this might be useful, but adds “there is large ambiguity in the extent to which fossil fuels with CCS would be compatible with the 2C and 1.5C targets” of the Paris Agreement.
However, why did it take a leak to make information public? Should not the citizens of these countries be allowed to see what their governments are doing on their behalf but behind closed doors?
There might be little that an ordinary Saudi could do to challenge their rulers’ actions, but in democratic Norway this should be a subject of public discussion and debate.
One answer would be for the IPCC to publish any submissions it receives as a matter of course. There would, naturally, continue to be ‘quiet chats' and the like, but such inputs would be easier to ignore if they are not made official by being put in writing and published.
Transparency is vital for good decision-making. Governments should always be held accountable for their actions and their claims on this most important issue should be open to being countered by anyone who might have different information or better reasoning.
A message from the Editor:
Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.
If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.
Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.