SNP's first 100 days shows Nicola Sturgeon's government is not focused on achieving independence – Kenny MacAskill MP

The re-elected SNP administration’s first 100 days are fast approaching, and they’re resembling a government in power, but with no idea for what purpose.
Nicola Sturgeon is approaching the end of her new government's honeymoon period and Kenny MacAskill is not impressed (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)Nicola Sturgeon is approaching the end of her new government's honeymoon period and Kenny MacAskill is not impressed (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)
Nicola Sturgeon is approaching the end of her new government's honeymoon period and Kenny MacAskill is not impressed (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

Normally that honeymoon period is viewed as critical for making your mark and setting political direction.

To be fair, as incumbents there’s perhaps slightly less need. But given that there are new faces in office and the country’s coming out of lockdown, you’d have expected some energy and profile.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The manifesto they were elected on may have been light, as well as uncosted, but you’d have thought they’d want to be laying out some big plans for the land.

Likewise you’d have supposed that new Cabinet Secretaries would have wanted to go hither and thither, pressing flesh and meeting key stakeholders. Maybe they have but they’ve sure as hell kept it hidden from the rest of us.

Instead, as ever, it’s the Nicola Sturgeon show and it’s a mixture of commentary on coronavirus and minor baubles being dispensed to show some activity and suggested largesse. The latter though only confirming that the big ticket items, such as health, housing and education remain unaddressed, so minor proposals are needed.

Read More
One hundred days is not enough to save Nicola Sturgeon from failure - Brian Mont...

When the big story’s about a political fix with the Greens, then you realise this is about machinations for political control, not a radical transformation of the land. Bums on ministerial seats for the Greens and entrenched power for the SNP, a new political age this sure isn’t.

Of course when you park your raison d’etre of independence, there are always going to be difficulties to say the least.

But in the absence of that or even a push for the devolution of more powers, then it was always going to be this way. The call for drug powers is more about political posturing than seeking to extend Holyrood's remit, let alone tackling the horrific problem, welcome though it may be. Instead the purpose seems to be staying in power but with little idea for what purpose.

It put me in mind of a conversation I’d with an SNP politician back in 2017, who is now not an inconsequential government figure.

They’d bumped into me at a social event and were berating me for comments I’d made about the ‘New SNP’. I tried to explain by saying I was struggling to see what the party was for. Independence I was told.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

I replied that it was off the agenda at the moment, and has continued to be as time has shown, so where stood the party? Again I was given mantras about independence and, with my patience wearing thin, I asked, where stood the party on core issues like class and social democracy? On being told “Nicola says...”, I walked off in exasperation.

That seems to encapsulate this administration. Even the big plan of a national care service is being soft-pedalled and other policy ideas are thin on the ground.

A political fix with the Greens is about staying in power, nothing to do with policy other than identity politics, and certainly not pursuing independence.

Kenny MacAskill is the Alba Party MP for East Lothian

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

Comments

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.