Keith Geddes: Make Edinburgh city centre somewhere worth visiting
But the latest analysis of traffic-generated pollution suggests that visitors and residents may be inhaling toxic gases and particulates at levels even more dangerous to their health than previously thought. We already knew traffic-borne pollution in much of the city centre and many of the surrounding streets with “canyon” tenements is hazardous to human health but the latest study highlights the need for action now.
The study by Edinburgh and Aberdeen Universities found that expectant mothers who were regularly exposed to toxic gases and particulates gave birth to babies born with smaller heads and shorter bodies. A similar outcome to babies born to mothers who smoke during pregnancy, except measurably worse!
Over the years various blue-sky thinkers have put forward myriad solutions to improving the Capital’s traffic problem. Despite the best of intentions none of the proposed strategies – apart from the trams – have seen the light of day. And our incomplete tram system can add to, rather than mitigate the problem, particularly in Princes Street. Edinburgh is now at “peak car”. People seeking to enjoy the city centre vistas have to compete with cars and end-to-end buses just to get a view. This is not sustainable in the short term, far less the long term.
Just imagine how much the city centre could be improved if, for example, George Street, instead of being a car park, became a tree-lined boulevard with plenty of space for cafes and street theatre joining together St Andrew and Charlotte Square. And were Princes Street to be made car-free and used only by trams and the occasional bus, how much more appealing a destination it would become.
A pipe dream? Only to those who are stuck in the present and cannot see a better future. Other cities have made massive city centre transformations. Portland, Oregon now has four tram routes – or streetcar routes as they call them. The city centre is relatively car-free, street furniture and new trees give the area a welcoming feel. And local businesses have not suffered.
Or take Seoul in South Korea which took the revolutionary step of demolishing the Cheonggyecheon expressway. The artificial river laid in its place created a 9km swath through the city centre, turning the area into a tranquil oasis. The proposal was not exactly welcomed by city centre traders and there were significant street battles between business people and the local police. But once complete even those who were bitterly opposed changed their way of thinking. And its popularity can be best measured by the ongoing programme of expressway demoliotions – 15 since 2002.
While there was much to welcome in the Edinburgh City Deal, particularly around research and innovation, it was a huge missed opportunity as far as public transport was concerned. £120 million to support improvements to the city bypass and Sheriffhall roundabout but only £20m to examine public transport improvements in west Edinburgh. Perhaps if there is ever a second City Deal it could be termed a “Green City Deal” as an indication that government and council both are committed to improving public health and creating quality places.
So it’s time to reimagine Edinburgh’s city centre. That’s a major challenge for the council, local business and local residents. It will take creative thinking and political courage. A good start would be to develop three or four tram routes so we have an integrated tram and bus system that is attractive to those who currently rely on the car. The city needs to work with ScotRail to improve service frequency from and to surrounding areas. Pedestrian space needs to be increased and a city centre tree planting programme started alongside quality street furniture.
I can think of no other country in the world that would allow its prize asset – the city centre – to effectively be turned into a slow-moving traffic jam.
Keith Geddes is policy director at Pagoda Porter Novelli