Gerry Hassan: Why the canon of Scottish independence will roar

Scotland will gain by being independent and lose some things … we have to choose for the right reasons

Scottish independence was once viewed as an eccentric, maverick subject, something not to be taken seriously or mentioned in polite society. Well, no more. The unionist parties talk of nothing else at the moment, and even the self-obsessed London political class and media have noted that something is happening.

After years of ignoring independence, now they want instant answers, detail and a vote – all on their terms.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The “how” of Scottish independence has become nearly universally accepted, and we have quickly moved on to the “why”.

The one exception is John McTernan, who earlier this week in The Scotsman asked for some elucidation on the question: why independence?

First, let’s locate independence in a modern, mature setting.

Independence isn’t primarily about unionism versus nationalism, a debate which turns most Scots off outside of these narrow political tribes. Instead, behind it is the issue of what kind of Scottish society we want to live in.

There’s a belief that the failures of British government, politics and society are so fundamental that we can make a better society as an independent nation.

It is less “Scotland why not?” and “Scotland the brave”, and more about “Scotland the future”.

Second, McTernan argues that no industrial country has broken up, ignoring the example of Czechoslovakia. There is British insularity in the anti-independence argument.

In the last two decades, 24 nations have emerged independent – from the end of Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Each of the 24 started from a less advantageous position than Scotland, and many have been successes.

Yes, there has been the odd disaster such as Belarus, but from Estonia to the Czech Republic and Slovenia, the successes have been many.

So here are 11 reasons that set out the “why” of Scottish independence.

1. Britain, according to academic Danny Dorling, is the fourth most unequal country in the rich world. The only more unequal places are the United States, Portugal and Singapore. British economic growth is increasingly about a narrow segment of society – primarily concentrated around London and the south east.

2. Britain, despite devolution, is one of the most centralised countries in western Europe. Then there is the travesty of Westminster governance, a critique of which was one of the main drivers behind Scottish devolution. Since the advent of the Scottish Parliament, Westminster has become even worse.

3. The nature and direction of English public services: the current English NHS Bill opens up health to parasite American and foreign private companies eager to get their hands on public health monies. This is an extension of New Labour public sector reform.

4. Then there is the character of British politics. There have been four periods of Labour government since 1945 and only one has succeeded in narrowing inequality: the Attlee government. The other three led by Wilson/Callaghan and Blair/Brown all presided over widening inequality.

5. The scale of poverty, health inequalities and dislocation in Scotland requires fundamental change: one in four children living in hardship, the worst life expectancy levels in western Europe. Doesn’t the union have to take some responsibility for this? Isn’t there at least the possibility independence could aid the transformational change we need to address this?

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

6. One wouldn’t argue for independence solely based on North Sea oil revenues, but a contrast between Norway and ourselves is salutary. The North Sea has oil reserves for the next 30 to 40 years; wouldn’t it be good to see some of its benefits directly benefit the Scottish people?

7. Foreign policy and international affairs (without reference to Iraq). The British state has for decades become a problem child in the world, a troublemaker in Europe, slavishly pro-American, a hawk on foreign adventures.

8. Defence: there is the controversy of the nuclearisation and militarisation of Scotland without the consent of its people.

9. Europe: Britain’s Euroscepticism shrinks its influence in the corridors of Brussels. An independent Scotland would be seen by France and Germany as a Euro enthusiast, and allow us direct representation on key Scottish interests: farming, fisheries, the oil industry and much more.

10. The Scottish public sphere has suffered in recent years with the atrophying of large parts of our mainstream media. Part of this is global economics and the internet, but part is the media regulatory framework. An independent Scotland would allow us to create an environment where our public broadcasting began to reflect and represent our culture.

11. Tory governments: for as long as Scots vote Conservative in such small numbers, whenever we have majority Tory governments at Westminster, there will be a crisis of legitimacy. Devolution hasn’t sorted this; it can’t because it is a political, not constitutional issue.

This last issue hurts Scottish Labour. Forty one years ago, when Labour gave evidence to the Kilbrandon commission on the constitution, the Labour delegation, led by John Pollock, was asked which it would choose if it had to: an independent, centre-left Scotland or a Conservative Britain, and it answered without reservation, a Conservative Britain. And this is still the bind they are in, choosing London over Scottish priorities.

An argument between the union and independence has to acknowledge nuance and subtlety.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Scotland will gain by being independent and lose some things. Being in the UK has advantages in pooling resources and risk and disadvantages.

There is a deep-seated pessimism in much of unionist opinion which either goes all hard and populist, as McTernan does, or believes the game is up and independence inevitable.

Nothing is inevitable. Scotland can become independent or remain part of the UK. More important is having a serious, grown-up discussion about our future.

We have to choose for the right reasons. It is that important.