Climate change: How activists from Scotland are taking legal action to stop UK government paying oil companies to make global warming worse – Dr Richard Dixon

In a case endorsed by environmental groups Friends of the Earth Scotland, Greenpeace and 350.org, three individuals are taking the UK government to court over its financial support for the oil and gas industry.

Legal cases on climate change and fossil fuels have been much in the news.

In 2019, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Dutch government must urgently reduce climate emissions in line with its human rights obligations.

Sign up to our Opinion newsletter

Sign up to our Opinion newsletter

At the end of April, the German Constitutional Court ruled on four cases, mostly brought by young people, concluding that climate protection is a human right and that current generations are allowing themselves too much of the available carbon budget, to the detriment of future generations. Germany will now have to improve its climate targets and plans.

In Austria, our sister organisation last week asked the ministry of economy to ban fossil fuels and will be going to court if they do not get a positive response.

This week the Spanish Parliament passed a climate law banning any new permits for exploration and production of fossil fuels, with an end to all production required by the end of 2042.

Read More

Read More
Climate change still key concern amid pandemic, study finds

Next week will see the verdict in a Dutch court in the case against Shell for not taking climate change seriously. They would have to reduce their emissions by 45 per cent by 2030 and, ultimately, it could see the world’s second largest oil company get out of fossil fuels altogether.

The global oil industry receives vast state subsidies but legal action is being taken in a number of countries to change that (Picture: Getty Images)

Closer to home, last week a case was lodged at the High Court by three individuals against the UK government, for their continued support of the oil industry. Mikaela Loach is a medical student in Edinburgh, Jeremy Cox is a retired oil worker and Kairin van Sweeden is an SNP activist from Aberdeen. The case will challenge the massive tax breaks given to the industry and the official policy of maximising economic recovery of oil and gas.

Since signing the Paris Agreement in 2016, the UK government has paid £3.2 billion of public money to North Sea oil and gas companies. Companies like Shell and BP paid next to nothing in tax but received tens or hundreds of millions in tax breaks from the government – we paid them to create more climate change.

Because of the government’s handouts, the UK has become the most profitable country in Europe to be an oil and gas company, with an estimated £250 billion of tax revenue lost over a 13-year period, compared to other oil-producing countries.

And, in a deal unique among industry sectors, the UK government has pledged to use nearly £20 billion of taxpayers’ money to help pay for cleaning up the industry’s mess when it leaves.

Instead of propping up the polluters, we should be phasing out fossil fuels, and helping workers and communities through a Just Transition to clean energy industries.

With the UN climate talks coming to Glasgow in November, the screaming contradiction of the UK’s continued drive to produce ever more oil and gas is suddenly very obvious.

Massive marches, divestment campaigns, policy plans and school strikes have all made a difference but it may be the courts which bring decisive action to end our extraction of fossil fuels.

Dr Richard Dixon is director of Friends of the Earth Scotland

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.