As the clocks go back, more light and space is needed if we are to commute by bike or on foot – Alastair Dalton

It’s the new nightmare after dark. The clocks have gone back and we are again commuting home in the gloom – but it has highlighted for me a range of forgotten dangers that are compromising our safe travel on foot and by bike.

The return of earlier darkness has also underlined a further challenge Scotland must face if it is to achieve the significant shift to cycling and walking in the face of the climate emergency – ensuring there is enough space for riders and pedestrians to get about without coming into conflict with each other as their numbers continue to increase.

The first autumn working in Glasgow city centre for 14 years has exposed me to a new culture.

Hide Ad

While by day I’ve already adjusted to delivery riders and other cyclists on the pavement and running red lights, after dark it’s even worse, with a fair few without lights – or conversely with front beams as dazzlingly bright as undipped vehicle headlights.

A congested section of shared path used by walkers and cyclists beside the Armadillo venue at the SEC in Glasgow. Picture: Cycling Embassy of Great Britain
Hide Ad

However, the situation is far worse on the off-road paths shared by cyclists and walkers which feed into the city centre, such as the popular route along the north bank of the Clyde which links to the west end.

Here, lighting is poorer, including on narrow sections, where you have walkers, including tourists and business visitors, runners and riders, all going at different speeds, trying to get past each other.

Hide Ad

At one sharp corner, several street lights are broken, creating a further hazard for everyone.

But one of the most problematic stretches is around the Scottish Event Campus (SEC) and the adjacent Hilton Garden Inn hotel, where the lack of sufficient and clearly-positioned blue and white shared path signs means it’s hardly surprising that pedestrians are bewildered at cyclists bearing down on them on the pavement.

Hide Ad
A shared path sign near the Riverside Museum in Glasgow alerting walkers and riders on a section with limited visibility. Picture: The Scotsman

That’s just one example, but I dare say readers can point to many similar situations across Scotland.

Hide Ad

Scottish Government-funded Cycling Scotland believes there should be no such shared pavements in densely-populated urban areas, which it said was in line with official guidance.

I think signage absolutely must be improved as an urgent first step.

Hide Ad

Embedding signs into the path is an effective way of getting the message across, as has been done on the Clyde-side route on a winding section with limited visibility near the Riverside Museum.

A shared path sign near the Riverside Museum in Glasgow. Picture: The Scotsman
Hide Ad

But consideration must also be given as to how to segregate walkers and cyclists on such off-road paths, and how to future proof both existing and new ones to ensure they have sufficient capacity to accommodate the growth in “active travel” that ministers are rightly so intent to achieve.

Tim Steiner, a transport planner at consultants Jacobs, told a meeting of experts in Glasgow on Wednesday that “lots of very hard decisions” lay ahead over space allocation.

Hide Ad

However, he also stressed to the Scottish Transport Applications and Research Conference that such segregation “has to be a key component” to realise the modal shift from cars, including increasing cycling from 2 to 19 per cent of trips.

The Scottish Government has set an extremely ambitious target of cutting car use by 20 per cent within just over seven years – after attempts to curb it have failed for decades.

Hide Ad

But with an impending huge increase in his budget, active travel minister Patrick Harvie has all to play for to get these paths built.



Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.