Analysis: Stop the ground zero mosque and please bin Laden

IS THERE any doubt about Osama bin Laden's position on the not-at-ground-zero mosque? Osama abhors the vision of interfaith harmony that the proposed Islamic centre represents. He fears Muslim clerics who can cite the Koran to denounce terrorism.

It's striking that many American Republicans share with al-Qaeda the view that the West and the Islamic world are caught inevitably in a "clash of civilisations". Anwar al-Awlaki, the US-born cleric who recruits jihadis from his lair in Yemen, tells the world's English-speaking Muslims that America is at war against Islam. You can bet that al-Awlaki will use the opposition to the mosque to recruit more terrorists.

In short, the proposed community centre is not just an issue on which Sarah Palin and bin Laden agree; it is also one in which opponents of the centre are playing into the hands of al-Qaeda.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

These opponents seem to be afflicted by two fundamental misconceptions. The first is that a huge mosque would rise on hallowed land at ground zero. In fact, the building would be something like a YMCA, two blocks away and apparently out of view from ground zero.

This is a dense neighbourhood packed with shops, bars, off-licences - not to mention the New York Dolls Gentlemen's Club and the Pussycat Lounge (which says that it arranges lap dances in a private room). Why do so many Republicans find strip clubs appropriate for the ground zero area but object to a house of worship? Are lap dances more sanctified than an earnest effort to promote peace?

And this is an earnest effort. I know Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf and his wife, Daisy Khan - the figures behind the Islamic community centre. Because I have written often about Arab atrocities in Darfur and about the abuse of women in Islamic countries, some Muslim leaders are wary of me. But Abdul Rauf and Khan are open-minded and have been strong advocates for women within Islam.

The second misconception underlying this debate is that Islam is an inherently war-like religion that drives believers to terrorism. Sure, the Islamic world is disproportionately turbulent, and mullahs sometimes cite the Koran to incite murder. But don't forget that the worst brutality in the Middle East has often been committed by more secular rulers, such as Saddam Hussein and Hafez al-Assad. And the mastermind of the 1970 Palestinian airline hijackings, George Habash, was a Christian.

Remember also that some of the most shocking brutality in the region was justified by the Bible, not the Koran. Crusaders massacred so many men, women and children in parts of Jerusalem that a Christian chronicler, Fulcher of Chartres, described an area ankle-deep in blood. While burning Jews alive, the Crusaders sang Christ, We Do All Adore Thee.

My hunch is that the violence in the Islamic world has less to do with the Koran or Islam than with culture, youth bulges in the population, and the marginalisation of women.

Then US president George Bush was statesmanlike after 9/11 in reaching out to Muslims and speaking of Islam as a religion of peace. Now many Republicans are cynically turning the Islamic centre into a nationwide issue in hopes of votes.

It is mind-boggling that so many Republicans are prepared to bolster the al-Qaeda narrative, and undermine the brave forces within Islam pushing for moderation.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Some Republicans say that it is not a matter of religious tolerance but of sensitivity to the feelings of relatives to those killed at ground zero. Hmm. They're just like the Saudi officials who ban churches, and even confiscate Bibles, out of sensitivity to local feelings.

On my last trip to Saudi Arabia, I brought in a Bible to see what would happen (alas, the customs officer searched only my laptop bag). Memo to Palin: Should we learn from the Saudis and protect ground zero by banning the Koran from Lower Manhattan?

For much of American history, demagogues have manipulated irrational fears toward people of minority religious beliefs, particularly Catholics and Jews. Many Americans once honestly thought that Catholics could not be true Americans because they bore supreme loyalty to the Vatican.

Today's crusaders against the Islamic community centre are promoting a similar paranoid intolerance, and one day we will be ashamed of it.

• Nicholas Kristof writes for the New York Times

Related topics: