William Wallace was famously tall, while Mel Gibson is not. He may not be as short as he’s reputed to be, but it can be hard to let a fact get in the way of a good story.
In Braveheart, the film makes a joke of the alleged difference in height between Gibson and Wallace when a young soldier protests the man before him cannot be the great Scottish hero, saying the real one is “seven feet tall”.
Wallace (Gibson) replies: “Yes, I’ve heard. Kills men by the hundreds. And if he were here, he’d consume the English with fireballs from his eyes, and bolts of lightning from his a***.”
It’s a good rebuttal of the idea that Gibson was too short to play Wallace – he wasn’t really unusually tall, that was just myth-making by the Scots.
And it perhaps also anticipated complaints about historical inaccuracies in the film, such as the lack of a bridge in its depiction of the Battle of Stirling Bridge, the kilts, the face paint and so on.
Sometimes it’s OK for a good story to stray from accepted history – even to the point of including lightning bolts that emanate from unusual places.
Just don’t take them too seriously.
A message from the Editor:
Thank you for reading this article on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.
With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.
Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit www.scotsman.com/subscriptions now to sign up.
Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.