Selfies could be used to detect heart disease says new study

Sending a “selfie” to the doctor could be a cheap and simple way of detecting heart disease according to the authors of a new study published today.
Selfie can detect heart disease says study.Selfie can detect heart disease says study.
Selfie can detect heart disease says study.

The study published in the European Heart Journal is the first to show that it’s possible to use a deep learning computer algorithm to detect coronary artery disease (CAD) by analysing four photographs of a person’s face.

Although the algorithm needs to be developed further and tested in larger groups of people from different ethnic backgrounds, the researchers say it has the potential to be used as a screening tool that could identify possible heart disease in people in the general population or in high-risk groups, who could be referred for further clinical investigations.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It is known already that certain facial features are associated with an increased risk of heart disease.

These include thinning or grey hair, wrinkles, ear lobe crease, xanthelasmata – small, yellow deposits of cholesterol underneath the skin, usually around the eyelids and arcus corneae (fat and cholesterol deposits that appear as a hazy white, grey or blue opaque ring in the outer edges of the cornea).

However, they are difficult for humans to use successfully to predict and quantify heart disease risk.

Professor Zhe Zheng, who led the research and is vice director of the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases and vice president of Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences said: “To our knowledge, this is the first work demonstrating that artificial intelligence can be used to analyse faces to detect heart disease.

"It is a step towards the development of a deep learning-based tool that could be used to assess the risk of heart disease, either in outpatient clinics or by means of patients taking ‘selfies’ to perform their own screening.

"This could guide further diagnostic testing or a clinical visit.”

He added: “Our ultimate goal is to develop a self-reported application for high risk communities to assess heart disease risk in advance of visiting a clinic. “This could be a cheap, simple and effective of identifying patients who need further investigation.

"However, the algorithm requires further refinement and external validation in other populations and ethnicities.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Prof. Zheng, Professor Xiang-Yang Ji, who is director of the Brain and Cognition Institute in the Department of Automation at Tsinghua University, Beijing, and other colleagues enrolled 5,796 patients from eight hospitals in China to the study between July 2017 and March 2019.

The patients were undergoing imaging procedures to investigate their blood vessels, such as coronary angiography or coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

They were divided randomly into training (5,216 patients, 90%) or validation (580, 10%) groups.

Trained research nurses took four facial photos with digital cameras: one frontal, two profiles and one view of the top of the head.

They also interviewed the patients to collect data on socioeconomic status, lifestyle and medical history.

Radiologists reviewed the patients’ angiograms and assessed the degree of heart disease depending on how many blood vessels were narrowed by 50% or more , and their location.

This information was used to create, train and validate the deep learning algorithm.

The researchers then tested the algorithm on a further 1,013 patients from nine hospitals in China, enrolled between April 2019 and July 2019.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The majority of patients in all the groups were of Han Chinese ethnicity.

They found that the algorithm out-performed existing methods of predicting heart disease risk (Diamond-Forrester model and the CAD consortium clinical score). In the validation group of patients, the algorithm correctly detected heart disease in 80% of cases (the true positive rate or ‘sensitivity’) and correctly detected heart disease was not present in 61% of cases (the true negative rate or ‘specificity’). In the test group, the sensitivity was 80% and specificity was 54%.

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

The dramatic events of 2020 are having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive. We are now more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription to support our journalism.

Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. Visit https://www.scotsman.com/subscriptions now to sign up.

By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Joy Yates

Editorial Director

Related topics:

Comments

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.