NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde: NHSGGC apologises after three patients die following failures in cancer screening programme

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde has apologised after three patients died following a botched cancer screening programme
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital. Image: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.Queen Elizabeth University Hospital. Image: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital. Image: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.

Scotland’s largest health board has apologised after three patients died due to not receiving follow up cancer screenings.

Following a clinical review of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHSGGC) patients who had a colonoscopy between 2020 and 2022, six patients of the same doctor were identified as “having suffered harm” - with three of the patients dying.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The review, of 2700 patients, was instigated following identification of “a small number” of patients who had not received appropriate follow-up care. An unspecified number of patients then went on to develop cancer.

The consultant, who NHSGGC is refusing to name due to “our obligations under data protection legislation”, was suspended in November 2022 and has since left the employment of NHSGGC.

The health board says that patients and families affected “have been fully informed of the outcome of the significant adverse event reviews” that have been carried out into these cases.

NHSGGC also says it informed the General Medical Council (GMC) of its investigations when the “issues first were identified” and has “continued to update” the GMC of the progress of its review and findings.

According to NHSGGC, an initial “electronic exercise” was carried out with the aim of rapid identification of patients most at risk.

“To provide further assurance a manual review of electronic scheduling diaries and other data sources was subsequently carried out and all remaining colonoscopy cases by this practitioner from 2020 onwards had case record review by the review team,” information provided by the health board reads.

“Following this review more than 100 patients who had colonoscopy undertaken by this doctor have been appointed as overdue their follow up colonoscopy.”

Professor Colin McKay, deputy medical director at NHSGGC, said: “We would like to offer our sincere apologies to patients who were not followed up appropriately and our condolences to the families of those patients who have died.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“When errors were first discovered, an immediate, comprehensive review was carried out of all cases managed by the doctor since 2020.

“Our investigations found that the doctor did not consistently follow up the results of investigations that had been completed or requested and therefore missed the opportunity for patients to be treated, including a number of patients who went on to develop malignancy.

“We would like to reassure patients that we have already contacted all those patients affected and that no other patients should be concerned that they may be involved.

“We will ensure that recommendations and any other learning from our review will be shared with other health boards.”

The vast majority of colonoscopies performed by the doctor were for patients in the bowel screening programme.

The review covered the period from January 2020 “as there was review evidence of appropriate follow up prior to then”.

Scottish Labour health spokeswoman Dame Jackie Baillie said: “This is deeply concerning and it is shocking to think that there have been colonoscopy patients in Glasgow missing out on vital follow-up care.

“I am also angry that it has taken three years for anything to come to light on this issue. The lack of transparency is unacceptable.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“Lessons need to be learned so this does not happen ever again to any other patient in Scotland.”

NHSGGC has now set up a contact number for anyone who may have concerns or questions about the investigation. The number is 0141 451 5435 and is staffed between 8am and 8pm Monday to Sunday.

Comments

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.