Welcome change risks confusing home buyers - comment

Finance Minister Kate Forbes yesterday picked up the property tax gauntlet thrown down by Chancellor Rishi Sunak and announced she was raising the threshold on Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT) paid by home buyers.
I do wonder if the minister could have been a bit bolder and more innovative, says Whyte. Picture: John Devlin.I do wonder if the minister could have been a bit bolder and more innovative, says Whyte. Picture: John Devlin.
I do wonder if the minister could have been a bit bolder and more innovative, says Whyte. Picture: John Devlin.

The Chancellor on Wednesday delivered a welcome boost for home-owners and the construction industry in England when he confirmed a nine-month holiday on Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT), during which no tax would be paid on house purchases up to £500,000.

In his mini-Budget speech, the Chancellor said property transactions had fallen by 50 per cent in May, adding: “House prices have fallen for the first time in eight years, uncertainty abounds in the market. A market we need to be thriving, we need people feeling confident, confident to buy, sell, renovate, move and improve, that will drive growth, that will create jobs.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Despite reports that LBTT (Scotland’s equivalent to SDLT) would remain unchanged, Forbes delivered a helping hand to Scotland’s construction and property sector by announcing the tax would only be paid on homes valued at more than £250,000 (previously it was £145,000).

Read More
Homebuyers get boost as purchase tax threshold raised

Forbes told Parliament: “I have listened to calls for me to raise the starting threshold to LBTT to help stimulate housing market activity and the economy. It is important, though, that any change made in Scotland is focused directly on the particular needs of the Scottish economy.”

She claimed the threshold change would mean “eight out of ten people purchasing a property in Scotland will be taken out of LBTT… and all home movers purchasing a property above £250,000 will be £2,100 better off.”

But what seems on the surface to be a very positive move risks causing confusion and uncertainty in the market because the minister did not put a date on when the changes come in to force. At the time of going to press it was also unclear how long this LBTT relaxation would last.

Preparation

Forbes said the change would not be immediate because legislation needed to be changed and Revenue Scotland needed to be prepared to manage and collect the tax – contrasting sharply with Sunak’s decision to raise the Stamp Duty threshold immediately. It begs the question – who is going to commit to buying a home in the near future when they may benefit from the upcoming LBTT change if they hold off?

And what about home-buyers just about to conclude missives – they will surely be aggrieved that they may lose out on a significant savings if they proceed with their purchase. The effect of this lack of clarity is that house-buying and selling will likely temporarily grind to a halt – as opposed to gaining a welcome immediate stimulus.

I broadly welcome the changes announced by the Scottish Government, they will encourage buyers spooked by Covid-19 related job security worries to feel more confident about their first or next property move. Once the changes kick in, the construction industry will also benefit and crack on with developments put on ice in lockdown.

But I do wonder if the minister could have been a bit bolder and taken a much more innovative approach to shaping our housing market? Perhaps additional value to our economy could have been achieved by a more ambitious, albeit time-limited, LBTT relaxation on new-build homes to create a genuine stimulus in the construction sector.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

This would recognise the huge importance of the construction sector in Scotland and economic activity generated by the construction of new homes, and continued need (notwithstanding recession) for more homes in Scotland.

A bolder approach might be to align LBTT incentives to the purchase of new (and possibly second hand homes) linked to stretching energy efficiency targets. This would encourage housebuilders/sellers to make homes even more efficient and give buyers the benefit of buying into that stock with LBTT relaxations – and in so doing create a greener housing stock by carrot rather than by stick.

Rodney Whyte, partner and residential property specialist at Pinsent Masons

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

The dramatic events of 2020 are having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive. We are now more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription to support our journalism.

Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. Visit https://www.scotsman.com/subscriptions now to sign up. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Joy Yates

Editorial Director

Comments

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.