SGU close to amalgamation agreement with SLGA

Lundin Ladies golf club. The SLGA-SGU merger is close to happening at the second attempt. Picture: TSPL
Lundin Ladies golf club. The SLGA-SGU merger is close to happening at the second attempt. Picture: TSPL
Have your say

The Scottish Golf Union appears to be tantalisingly close to getting the green light at the end of next month to amalgamate with the Scottish Ladies Golfing Association.

According to a poll conducted by The Scotsman, 11 of the Area associations will almost certainly be delivering a “yes” vote at an extraordinary general meeting, which has been confirmed for 30 March in 

That would leave just one of the other five Areas needing 
to support the proposal to 
give it the required two-thirds majority, having already received the unanimous backing of the SLGA membership.

Unlike four years ago, when opposition was apparent prior to a 10-6 vote being delivered by the men against the proposal, the mood amongst the Areas is certainly more relaxed as the process edges towards the ballot box once again.

However, those that have still to determine their vote have “one or two issues” to discuss with Tom Craig, the SGU chairman, as he undertakes a final push in the bid to get the proposal through by meeting with all of the Area associations by the end of this month.

According to our poll, Angus, Ayrshire, Borders, Clackmannanshire, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Lothians, North, North East, Perth & Kinross and South are all set to back the proposition to bring Scottish golf into line with most other countries around the world.

“It has got to be done and dusted - we need to move on with this,” said Jim Burns, the SGU’s South delegate, while his North East counterpart, Jim Hunter, commented: “It is the way forward and we are very much in favour of it.”

Against it last time around, the Lothians have deemed the new proposal as “fit for purpose” despite it failing to fully address some of its concerns. “We can work with what is there and try to achieve what we’d like once the amalgamated body is in place,” said president Allan Shaw.

Wearing his Borders cap rather than speaking as the new SGU president, Jack Keeney said he hoped the process will be “straightforward this time” to bring the thorny issue to an end. “A lot of people are getting fed up hearing about the amalgamation as it has gone on too long,” he added.

According to Perth & Kinross secretary Tom McLevy, though, the proposal is still facing some opposition. “At the SGU Conference last month, there were one or two dissenting voices,” he revealed. “Some of the things being said were childish, in my opinion. There is so much riding on it and there is nothing detrimental in this proposal to any side - men and women.”

In fairness, the five Areas unable to say “yes” at present - Argyll & Bute, Dunbartonshire, Fife, Renfrewshire and Stirlingshire - are either waiting to hear back from their clubs or in the process of letting them know their own thoughts on the proposal.

In the background, an independent poll initiated by the SGU is trying to get clubs to cast their vote, though Ian Storrie, the Renfrewshire secretary, said he can’t see the purpose in that. “The SGU can use whatever propaganda it wants; the only vote that counts is the one that will be cast by the Areas,” he said.

In contrast, Perthshire is urging its clubs to take part in that poll. “We are asking them to engage with the process rather than sitting back,” added McLevy, expressing a sentiment shared by others, including the aforementioned Craig. “This is a great opportunity for them to say what they think,” said the SGU chairman.

While certainly taking nothing for granted, he has been heartened by seeing the SLGA members vote 204-0 in favour of the proposal, as well as the Lothians adopting its stance of support on this occasion.

“Even though we had a good feeling, you never know how things are going to pan out and I think even the ladies themselves would be surprised that it was a unanimous vote last weekend,” said Craig.

“I was also absolutely delighted to hear that from the Lothians. They are a big part of Scottish golf. It’s not just the Lothians that have given me that kind of message from the Areas. There’s a groundswell of support and it is really encouraging.

“The message I’m getting generally is that the process has involved with everyone with an interest and clearly the Areas have a big interest in Scottish golf and a huge role to play in the future of Scottish golf.

“So getting Areas like the Lothians to come forward and say, ‘yes, this is good for us’, that made me feel as though the Working Group have really done a good job.”

It doesn’t take a genius to work out that the SGU is using the independent poll to try and get the clubs to come out with a comprehensive “yes” vote, which would leave the Areas having to follow suit given they, of course, are governed by the clubs.

It’s not that long ago, however, that lots of clubs moaned about the SGU due to a perceived lack of support in their direction from the governing body, something that has improved but, according to Craig, still needs to get a lot better.

“The clubs are what really matter in Scottish golf - they are the engine through which we can regenerate the participation in golf in Scotland so we want to know what they think,” he added.

“I think there is a much greater focus on the importance of clubs and a much greater understanding of what we are trying to do. But we are only at the foothills here. We still need to get a much better engagement with the clubs and their members.”

Will the SGU’s vote be “yes” this time? It has to be and the Areas know that. One or two might still deliver a “no” on 30 March but, finally, we should be able to move on and look forward to a new era in Scottish golf.