English football’s governing body imposed the sanction because he placed 1,260 bets on matches between March 2006 and May 2013. He was also fined £30,000.
At 34, the Burnley midfielder believes the ban will effectively end his career and has said he will appeal against its length. There is no guarantee he would be allowed to play pending that appeal.
Burnley are currently 16th in the Premier League, five points above relegation, with four games to play.
But it is the questions Barton raises about football and gambling which will provoke the most debate, as many will sympathise with the points raised in an almost 1,500-word statement on his website.
“I think if the FA is truly serious about tackling the culture of gambling in football, it needs to look at its own dependence on the gambling companies, their role in football and in sports broadcasting, rather than just blaming the players who place a bet,” he wrote.
“Surely they need to accept there is a huge clash between their rules and the culture that surrounds the modern game, where anyone who watches football on TV or in the stadia is bombarded by marketing, advertising and sponsorship by betting companies, and where much of the coverage now, on Sky for example, is intertwined with the broadcasters’ own gambling interests.
“That all means this is not an easy environment in which to try to stop gambling, or even to encourage people within the sport that betting is wrong. It is like asking a recovering alcoholic to spend all his time in a pub or a brewery. If the FA is serious about tackling gambling I would urge it to reconsider its own dependence on the gambling industry. I say that knowing that every time I pull on my team’s shirt, I am advertising a betting company.”
Burnley are sponsored by Dafabet, making them one of ten English Premier League clubs who advertise gambling firms on their shirts.
The FA tightened the rules on betting in 2014 to stop players in England’s top eight divisions betting on any football-related activity, anywhere in the world. Previously, players were not allowed to bet on games or competitions they were involved in or could influence.
The change in rules brought England into line with the Scottish FA which has prohibited players from betting on any football match for a number of years. Barton, in fact, fell foul of the SFA last year when he was given a one-match ban for placing 44 football bets whilst playing for Rangers, who are sponsored by 32Red, an online casino company. Indeed, Scottish football appears equally in thrall to the gambling industry, with its league and both cup competitions sponsored by bookmakers.
Barton’s statement starts with an acknowledgement that football should have gambling rules and an acceptance he has broken them. Describing himself as an addict who grew up in a culture where gambling was normalised, he admits to placing more than 15,000 bets on sport since 2004. But he goes on to say he is “very disappointed at the harshness of the sanction” and suggests he has been punished more seriously because of his reputation.
Barton has served numerous FA bans for misconduct during his 15-year professional career. He has also twice been convicted of assault, spending 11 weeks in prison in 2008.
Since then, however, Barton has tried to control his temper, tackle his drinking and cultivate interests in philosophy and politics. The latter has led to him campaigning for gay rights and appearing on the BBC’s Question Time.
Barton made several bets on his own team to lose but stressed he had “given everything” in every game he has played and was not involved in the matchday squads for any of those games.
“One thing I can state with absolute certainty – I have never placed a bet against my own team when in a position to influence the game, and I am pleased that in all of the interviews with the FA, and at the hearing, my integrity on that point has never been in question,” he added.