Norway massacre: ‘Sane’ Anders Breivik granted his wish: life in prison

A NORWEGIAN court sentenced Anders Breivik to 21 years in prison yesterday, denying prosecutors the insanity ruling they hoped would show that his massacre of 77 people was the work of a madman, not part of an anti-Muslim crusade.

• Anders Breivik would have appealed if declared insane

• Mass murderer sees himself as political prisoner

• Norway’s maximum sentence is 21 years in jail

The sentence brings a form of closure to Norway, which was shaken to its core by the bomb and gun attacks on 22 July, 2011, because Breivik’s lawyers said before the ruling that he would not appeal against any ruling that did not declare him insane.

But it also means Breivik got what he wanted: a ruling that paints him as a political terrorist instead of a psychotic mass-murderer.

Breivik smiled with apparent satisfaction when Judge Wenche Elisabeth Arntzen read the ruling, declaring him sane enough to be held criminally responsible and sentencing him to “preventive detention”, which means it is unlikely he will ever be released. As expected, he confirmed he would not appeal the sentence.

Since his arrest, Breivik has said the attacks were meant to draw attention to his extreme right-wing ideology and to inspire a multi-decade uprising by “militant nationalists” across Europe.

Prosecutors had argued Breivik was insane as he plotted his attacks to draw attention to a rambling “manifesto” that blamed Muslim immigration for the disintegration of European society.

Breivik argued that the authorities were trying to portray him as sick to cast doubt on his political views, and said during the trial that being sent to an insane asylum would be the worst thing that could happen to him.

“He has always seen himself as sane so he isn’t surprised by the ruling,” Breivik’s defence lawyer Geir Lippestad said.

The five-judge panel in the Oslo district court convicted Breivik, 33, of terrorism and premeditated murder and ordered him imprisoned for a period between 10 and 21 years, the maximum allowed in Norway.

Such sentences can be extended as long as an inmate is considered too dangerous to be released, and legal experts say Breivik will almost certainly spend the rest of his life in jail.

Survivors of the attacks and relatives of victims welcomed the ruling.

Wearing a dark suit and sporting a thin beard, Breivik smirked as he walked into the courtroom to hear his sentence, and raised a clenched-fist salute.

He confessed to the attacks during the trial, describing in gruesome detail how he detonated a car bomb at the government headquarters in Oslo and then opened fire at the annual summer camp of the governing Labour Party’s youth wing.

Eight people were killed and more than 200 injured by the explosion. Sixty-nine people, most of them teenagers, were killed in the shooting spree on Utoya island.

The youngest victim was 14.

Breivik’s lawyers say he is already at work writing sequels to a 1,500-page manifesto he released on the internet before the attacks.

The impact of Breivik’s violence has been huge. It has forced Norway to accept that terror does not come only in the guise of foreign fundamentalists, but from one of their own.

The son of a Norwegian diplomat and a nurse who divorced when he was a child, Breivik had been a law-abiding citizen until the attacks, except for a brief spell of spray-painting graffiti during his youth.

Norwegian police and government ministers have faced severe criticism for their actions before and during the attacks.

The police response was marred by poor communication and technical mishaps. It took officers more than an hour to reach Utoya, as a boat carrying the Swat team was overloaded and stalled in the lake.

Norway’s only police helicopter was not used because its crew was on vacation.

The country’s justice minister and police chief both resigned in the aftermath and some critics have called on the prime minister to step down.

The judges took turns reading sections of the 90-page ruling, starting with the verdict and sentence, and then going over a chronology of the rampage, victim by victim, and describing their injuries.

Judge Arne Lyng noted that the fertiliser bomb that Breivik set off outside the government headquarters could have been even more devastating.

“It was pure luck that not many more were killed,” the judge said.

Since his guilt was not in question, Breivik’s sanity was the key issue to be decided by the trial, with two psychiatric teams reaching opposite conclusions.

One gave Breivik a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia, a severe mental illness that would preclude imprisonment, while the other found him narcissistic and dissocial but criminally sane.

At the end of his sentencing hearing, Breivik said appealing against the judgment would

“legitimise” the court.

He also apologised to “militant nationalists” for not having killed more people in the attacks in July last year.