Australian legislators vote
down gay marriage bill

Australia’s lower house of parliament has overwhelmingly rejected a bill that would have legalised gay marriage, and similar legislation looks unlikely to pass despite public support for same-sex unions.

Australia’s lower house of parliament has overwhelmingly rejected a bill that would have legalised gay marriage, and similar legislation looks unlikely to pass despite public support for same-sex unions.

The house of representatives voted 98-42 against the legislation yesterday, the first of four bills introduced to parliament that aim to lift the country’s ban on same-sex marriage. A separate bill was also being debated in the senate.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Polls show that most Australians support gay marriage, but the Liberal Party-led conservative opposition coalition and many in the ruling centre-left Labour Party are against it.

“I think at some future time our parliament will catch up with community opinion, just as it has on other issues,” senior government minister Anthony Albanese said after the vote. “When marriage equality occurs, people will wonder what the fuss was about.”

Australian law defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Labour lifted its long-standing opposition to gay marriage last year, but prime minister Julia Gillard remains opposed to it.

Ms Gillard allowed Labour members to make a rare “conscience vote” on the bill yesterday, which lets legislators vote in line with their personal beliefs without risking expulsion if they defy the party line.

Opposition leader Tony Abbott did not give Liberal members that option.

Ms Gillard’s government holds a small majority in parliament and several Labour members personally oppose gay marriage. The chance of any pro-gay marriage bill passing is, therefore, remote.

Finance minister Penny Wong, who is gay, acknowledged in recent days that the legislation was unlikely to pass, but still argued passionately for its approval during the debate.

“If you subscribe to the principal of equality, as I’m sure most in the chamber would, then substitute ‘same sex’ for ‘race’ in this debate and see if it changes your view,” Ms Wong, who has a Chinese-Malaysian father and Australian mother of European
descent, said in the chamber. “Just imagine if we told Australians today that they could not marry the person they love because of the colour of their skin.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The debate prompted one Liberal senator to step down as Mr Abbott’s parliamentary secretary after the senator made comments suggesting that permitting gay marriage could lead to calls for the legalisation of bestiality and polygamy.

Speaking in a senate debate on Tuesday, Cory Bernardi said: “The next steps is … having three people that love each other should be able to enter into a permanent union endorsed by society, or four people?

“There are even some creepy people out there, who say that it’s OK to have consensual sexual
relations between humans and animals. Will that be a future step?”

Mr Abbott yesterday called Mr Bernardi’s comments “ill-disciplined”.

“They’re views that I think many people will find repugnant,” he said.

Ms Gillard cancelled a scheduled address to a Christian lobby group this month over what she called “heartless” comments made by the group’s managing director that suggested being gay was a bigger health hazard than smoking.

The senate is expected to vote on its bill later this week.

Related topics: