Welfare reforms slated by think-tank

WORK and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith’s welfare reforms, intended to encourage claimants to find work, could leave many households worse off, an influential think-tank has warned.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) questioned whether computer systems at the Department for Work and Pensions would be able to cope with the introduction of the new universal credit, which is due to replace a raft of out-of-work benefits from October 2013.

It warned that the overall effect of Mr Duncan Smith’s benefit changes would be to add to the complexity of a benefits system which they were supposed to simplify.

Mr Duncan Smith has always said that the key principle behind the universal credit is to remove disincentives to claimants taking jobs by ensuring people are always better off in work.

However, the JRF said many households would actually be worse off or only marginally better off as a result of the changes. While universal credit would incentivise more people to take so-called “mini-jobs” – involving less than 16 hours a week – it would not encourage people to take the next step into full-time work, enabling them to move out of poverty.

“Marginal increases in earnings alone are unlikely to be sufficient incentive to move into full-time work, with small financial gains likely to be wiped out by costs such as childcare and travel,” the report said.

At the same time, changes to council tax benefit and to social fund loans designed to help families in crisis would create additional complexity and were “likely to be so aggressive as to leave some people worse off as their earnings rise”.