Refugees rejected by Australia go to Cambodia

A refugee held in Australian custody on the island of Nauru is escorted by Cambodian police on arrival at Phnom Penh airport. Picture: Getty
A refugee held in Australian custody on the island of Nauru is escorted by Cambodian police on arrival at Phnom Penh airport. Picture: Getty
Have your say

Four asylum seekers rejected by Australia started a new life in Cambodia yesterday, becoming the first to be resettled under a deal between the two nations that human rights advocates have criticised as misguided and inhumane.

Cambodia agreed to accept two Iranian men, an Iranian woman and a Rohingya man from Myanmar under a £20 ­million four-year agreement to resettle hundreds of asylum seekers who have been living in an Australian-run detention camp on the Pacific island nation of Nauru for years.

The agreement was signed at a ceremony in Phnom Penh in September by the Cambodian interior minister, Sar Kheng, and Australia’s then-immigration minister, Scott Morrison.

However, the choice of impoverished Cambodia as a new home for asylum seekers has so far attracted little interest among the refugees, and only four among 677 on Nauru had signed up for the package.

Cambodia is plagued by poverty, corruption and human rights abuses. Medical care outside main cities is almost non-existent and jobs are so scarce that more than 800,000 people have left to find work abroad.

“Cambodia clearly has no will or capacity to integrate refugees permanently into Cambodian society,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch.

“These four refugees are essentially human guinea pigs in an Australian experiment,” said Mr Robertson, adding that the Cambodian government had sent dozens of minority ­Montagnard refugees back to ­Vietnam and Uighur asylum seekers to China.

He added: “This is not a regional solution, it’s bribing poorer countries to take obligations that Australia wants to evade – and it will have a harshly negative impact on protection of refugees throughout the ­region.”

Denise Coghlan, director of the Jesuit refugee service in Cambodia, said she was “glad that Cambodia offers hospitality to refugees, particularly the Rohingyan, who have been turned back by other countries including Australia”.

Australian officials have said they were working with the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) and other groups in Cambodia to provide the four with housing, jobs, transport and education.

After arrival, they were taken to temporary accommodation in the capital, IOM said in a statement.

The agency said it would begin providing essential support, including language training, cultural orientation and health and job services.

Australia’s tough policies of turning back and refusing to resettle any refugee who arrives on its shores by boat have stopped them from coming since the conservative government was elected in September 2013, according to Immigration Minister Peter Dutton.

Tony Abbott, Australia’s prime minister, was elected on a pledge to “stop the boats”.

Mr Abbott said in April that the European Union should ­follow suit in turning back asylum-seeker boats, describing it as the only way to end deaths at sea.

But the government still has to resettle more than 31,000 of the 52,000 asylum seekers who arrived in Australia by boat during the six years that the Labour Party was in power.