Oil and gas better off with UK, says David Cameron

Share this article
Have your say

SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE: The North Sea oil and gas industry is better supported by the “deep pockets” and “broad shoulders” of the UK economy than it would be if Scotland was independent, the Prime Minister has said.

David Cameron made the claim as he clashed with Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond over the future of the sector when the two leaders held rival cabinet meetings just a few miles from each other in the north east of Scotland.

A view of part of the BP Etap platform (Eastern Trough Area Project) in the North Sea, around 100 miles east of Aberdeen. Picture: PA

A view of part of the BP Etap platform (Eastern Trough Area Project) in the North Sea, around 100 miles east of Aberdeen. Picture: PA

Mr Cameron went on the attack in the independence debate by gathering his top team north of the border in Aberdeen and warning that leaving the UK would harm the key sector.

The Scottish and UK cabinet meetings were held as retired oil executive Sir Ian Wood published a report calling for measures to generate £200 billion for the British economy by ensuring up to four billion extra barrels are recovered from the North Sea over the next 20 years.

The Prime Minister backed that report as he insisted the oil and gas sector is better supported by the UK than it would be in an independent Scotland.

He said: “It’s more important than ever that the North Sea oil and gas industry has the backing of the whole of the United Kingdom, it has the deep pockets and the broad shoulders of the UK economy to make sure there are the tax allowances, the solidity, the investment, to make sure we can go on benefiting from this for many years to come.

“Scotland has done well out of the North Sea and the United Kingdom has done well out of the North Sea. It has been an international success story.

“Now. as we get to the later stages of the North Sea, long-term investment, deep pockets from the UK Government is going to be really important to recover that oil and gas.”

He rejected suggestions that Scotland or the UK should have set up a Norway-style oil fund to save for the future.

“We see that North Sea revenues have built schools and hospitals and roads and railways,” he said.

“Here in Scotland they’ve sustained a level of spending per head that is ahead of that of the rest of the United Kingdom.”

But Mr Salmond, speaking after the Scottish cabinet met in nearby Portlethen, highlighted Norway as an example of a small country with a successful oil industry.

The Scottish First Minister said: “We are told today that North Sea oil and gas is better handled by a big country like Britain as opposed to a small country like Scotland.

“That’s a very interesting concept for people in this part of the country, who can glance across the North Sea to Norway, a country smaller than Scotland but a country which by every observation has handled its oil and gas resources better than the stewardship of Westminster.

“I don’t mean better just for the companies earning profits and investment, that’s important, and not even just for the workforce terms, conditions and safety, which is hugely important.

“I mean handling the oil and gas resource for the community as a whole as Norway has accumulated much of its revenues for a futures fund for future generations.”

The Scottish Government has put forward plans to establish two separate oil funds if there is a Yes vote in September’s referendum - one short-term fund to help deal with fluctuations in oil and gas revenues, alongside a long-term savings fund.

But the Prime Minister claimed Mr Salmond “underplays the risks” of independence.

“This family of nations is better off together, not just that Scotland is better off in the United Kingdom but we in the rest of the United Kingdom think that we are better off with Scotland - that we want you to stay,” he said.

“My argument is one that is unremittingly positive about the success of this family of nations and we should keep the family together.”

The Prime Minister again refused to entertain calls for him to go head to head with Mr Salmond in a televised debate on the referendum.

“The debate that needs to take place is the debate in Scotland between people of differing views,” he said.

Downing Street said tax revenues from oil and gas in 2012-13 were £4.7 billion lower than the previous year - a drop of more than 40% and a sum it says equates to more than a third of Scotland’s health budget or two-thirds of its spending on education.

Before chairing the UK cabinet meeting in Aberdeen, Mr Cameron toured a BP installation 150 miles (240km) east of the city and argued that Scotland alone would find it harder to invest and deal with oil market volatility.

“Because we are a top 10 economy we can afford the tax allowances, the investment, the long-term structure that is necessary to make sure we recover as much from the North Sea as possible,” he said.

However, Mr Salmond claimed the “massive investment” currently going into the North Sea could have occurred earlier “if it hadn’t been for George Osborne’s number of tax changes that caused uncertainty”.

He said: “We’ve had 16 tax changes in the North Sea in 10 years, we’ve had 14 oil ministers in the last 17 years, three in the last four years, one thing that Scottish control of oil and gas resources will offer is a much more stable, long term policy.”

Mr Salmond has promised to base part of the Scottish energy ministry in Aberdeen if there is a Yes vote on September 18.

Every person in Scotland could receive “a present of £125,000” if the UK Government refuses to agree to a currency union, Mr Salmond suggested.

The Scottish Government would refuse to finance its share of the UK debt as a “logical conclusion” of Mr Osborne’s intransigence on the pound, Mr Salmond said.

He also repeated his pledge to create an oil fund for Scotland similar to Norway, which has an oil fund worth about £100,000 per person.

“Norway, instead of being burdened by debt like the UK is at the moment, has an oil fund of £550 billion, about £100,000 for every man, woman and child in Norway, which powers the Norwegian economy and secures it into the future,” Mr Salmond said.

“The Bank of England holds about a third of UK debt and if you seize the assets you end up with all of the liabilities.

“That would be about £100 billion to £125 billion, which we’ve offered to finance as Scotland’s share in the White Paper.

“But if he tries to seize the assets, he ends up with all of the liabilities.

“That’s why we know he’s bluffing because we all know George Osborne.

“Do you think George Osborne is going to make a present of £125,000 to every man, woman and child in Scotland?

“I doubt it, and therefore what they are running is a gigantic bluff.”

Following the public meeting, Mr Salmond met residents of Angus Court sheltered housing complex in Portlethen.

He rejected an offer of biscuits, explaining to staff that he is on a fast day in his “5-2” diet, a popular regime which involves fasting for two days of the week.

He said the day in Aberdeen has been “a tale of two cabinets”.

“The Scottish cabinet engage with the people at a church hall meeting in Portlethen, people come and ask questions and get a total dialogue,” he said.

“The UK cabinet jets into Aberdeen, doesn’t meet anybody and jets back out again.

“That the Prime Minister is not prepared to debate with me, and that he’s not prepared to debate with the people of Scotland, is totally extraordinary.”


Scottish independence: North east voters back No

Salmond unveils Oil and Gas Innovation centre plan

Peter Jones: Independence will need UK assistance

Leaders: Plan B for offers no monetary control

Salmond indicates Plan B is to keep using pound