A City of Edinburgh Council committee voted in March for a nil-cap on sex establishments – a policy set to be implemented in April, which the city’s strippers fear will put them out of work and has left venues concerned for their future.
They have taken their fight against the policy to the Court of Session in Edinburgh, where Lord Richardson was told by Christine O’Neill KC on Friday the council has the right to set the cap at zero.
During her submission in the second day of hearings, she said it was because, in part, the Scottish Parliament had set out a legislative duty to determine the appropriate number from time to time, and that “Parliament also provided the number may be zero”.
She said while it was currently set to zero, the number could be revised in future meetings. There is one such meeting pencilled in for February, the court was told.
The judicial review has been told there has not been sufficient explanation for the zero policy, but Ms O’Neill said in these circumstances there does not need to be one because it is not a specific licensing application.
“This is a policy decision taken in context of a debate among elected representatives as to their view and appropriate way forward, not a determination of an individual application,” she told the court.
She said in individual licensing cases, of which this is not one, applicants would have to be told in writing why they had been refused.
Venues in the city are being represented by Aidan O’Neill KC, while David Welsh has argued against the policy on behalf of the United Sex Workers (USW) union.
Mr Welsh told the judicial review on Thursday the policy would impede on strippers’ rights, and a ban would see dancers struggle to pay their rents, push them into debt, and break up with their partners because they have to move city to work.
Of the nil-cap policy, he said: “If you want to stay in Edinburgh, you have to do another job.
“If you want to do the job you have chosen to do, and works for your lifestyle and circumstances, you have to work somewhere else.”
Dancer Sarah had said: “We feel the council has pushed ahead with this policy with blinkers on, despite everything they were told about the devastating impact it would have on us and our livelihoods.
"Now we have the chance to be heard in court. I need this job to support my family. To be told by someone on their moral high horse that I can’t do it any more in the city I live in is frankly insulting.”
Earlier this year, USW raised money to fund the judicial review.
The decision made by the city’s regulatory committee in March was a knife-edge five-to-four vote in favour of setting the cap at zero.
Councillors had the option of setting the cap at four, keeping all the clubs open, but this was rejected during the two-and-a-half-hour meeting.