At first glance Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland seems to have struck a balanced tone on the question of continuing attempts to bring all those allegedly involved in the Lockerbie bombing to justice (your report, 22 December).
But many will be surprised at his remark that “not one Crown Office investigator or prosecutor has raised a concern about the evidence in the case”.
Miscarriages of justice have often been identified by the vigilance of writers and journalists rather than simply the rigour of the official legal establishment.
He and his law officers should never close their minds to information that might come to light from many sources within and outwith Libya.
Nor should he be inhibited by any complex geopolitical factors which might get in the way of the search for the truth.
The Lockerbie controversy has moved on in recent years, largely because of the downfall of the Gaddafi regime in Libya.
Whereas there is still some doubt as to whether Abdel Baset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi was involved at all, the emphasis seems to have shifted.
Who were the other culprits in the Libyan hierarchy, it has been asked? This now seems to be the modus operandi of Mr Mulholland and his officers.
But while some doubt might remain about Megrahi’s guilt, he cannot let that matter rest.
The case for an international inquiry under United Nations supervision may still be the way to establish whether Libya and its intelligence service was involved at all and, if so, was Megrahi simply a soldier carrying out orders from a deadly chain of command?