Guy Sorman: Green ideology, not science, to blame for nixing nuclear power

The meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant has sent political aftershocks racing around the globe. More often than not, however, the shocks have been ideological, with no basis in science.

The managers of Tokyo Electric Power (TEPCO), which operates the Fukushima reactors, have been justly criticised for using an old generation of poorly maintained generators. The Japanese, who perceive themselves as the world's best engineers, now feel humiliated.

But the collective reaction in Japan has not been to repudiate nuclear energy. After all, the Fukushima accident has severely injured only a few people - probably fewer than a dozen workers are dangerously irradiated. Almost all of the thousands of Japanese victims were drowned by the tsunami wave, not wiped out by a nuclear meltdown.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Japan will not stop using nuclear power. Instead, its engineers will develop better and safer plants, most likely relying on the miniaturised nuclear reactors that were planned to replace the aging plant at Fukushima. Most Japanese have remained rational in the face of their country's tragedy, as have most people in Asian countries such as China and South Korea, which, likewise, have not abandoned their commitment to nuclear energy.

This is not the case in Europe and the United States, where Fukushima's ideological aftershocks have been most destructive. German chancellor Angela Merkel's government was the first to overreact by deciding to close down all nuclear reactors in the coming years - a radical move driven by domestic politics.

Merkel's government does not include Germany's Greens, but the Green ideology has become a widely-shared national creed in Germany. Indeed, one can relate popular hostility toward nuclear energy to Germany's traditional romantic cult of nature, not to science. Germany's nuclear plants will be replaced by more thermal plants, implying a large increase in German carbon emissions and a Germany without nuclear power of its own will buy it from France, which has no intention of closing its nuclear plants.

In the US, the ideological aftershock is closer to Germany's than to France's. President Barack Obama's administration has thrown billions of dollars at wind, solar, ethanol and other alternative-energy resources. Now the Fukushima tragedy is being used to justify continuing these economically dubious programmes. We can bet that none of these alternative energies will easily replace oil, gas and nuclear power in the foreseeable future.

At market prices, without public subsidies, a unit of energy produced by solar or wind in the US costs five times more than a unit produced by oil, gas or nuclear plants. Moreover, supporters of alternative energies systematically downplay their negative environmental impact. A wind turbine requires 50 tons of steel and half a square mile of ground space.

The irony of the current situation is that innovation and entrepreneurial activity, without government support, is taking place in the field of energy generation. The most promising breakthrough may well be the discovery of huge reserves of shale gas.

Indeed, thanks to the new techniques in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, shale gas may well become the dominant energy resource of the future. Shale gas could thus reduce dependency on OPEC oil and gas while reducing carbon emission. Gas generates ten times less carbon than biomass or ethanol, which ecologists so heavily promote.

Beyond Fukushima, future energy supplies will most likely rely more and more on miniaturised nuclear plants and shale gas - a mix capable of responding to a rapidly urbanising world population's growing demand for electricity.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Such a renewed energy balance would impact the current global balance of power. Shale gas is abundant in Europe and North America. Thus, the energy of tomorrow could well reinforce the world's democracies and weaken its most repressive regimes, where most oil is to be found.

Within this new geopolitical framework, green ideology will survive like a cult or a recipe for economic suicide. l Guy Sorman, a French philosopher and economist, is the author of Economics Does Not Lie.

Related topics: