As I understand it, the draft Scottish constitution document declares that the head of state of an independent Scotland will be Queen Elizabeth II, followed by her descendants. I would expect the Queen to point out that it would be inappropriate for her, as a foreigner, to occupy such a position. Comparisons with Canada, New Zealand and Australia are false.
Acceptance of the title “Elizabeth II” is itself invalid in reference to Scotland as an independent country, which has never had a first queen of that name, although the precedent set at the actual joining of the crowns in 1603 might suggest the title “Elizabeth 1st and 2nd” – but of what country?
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdI firmly support Scottish independence, but it must be an absolute state, with no ties to UK monarchy, currency or any other element in its constitution: the very word itself means relying on our own efforts, and to promote it on any grounds other than self-sufficiency is dishonest.
Robert Dow, Tranent